Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 1012 
ARTICLES
Year : 1997  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 107-112

Peer review and refereeing in medicine and medical sciences


Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Asir Central Hospital, Abha, Saudi Arabia

Correspondence Address:
Oluwole Gbolagunte Ajao
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, P.O. Box 641, Abha
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 19864786

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Every academic scientist will come into contact with peer review process either as a reviewer of others work, or as an author whose work is being reviewed by others, or as an applicant for research grant. Historically, peer review process came at various times to various journals for a variety of reasons in haphazard manner. Many forms of criticisms have been made against the process of peer review, and some critics do not believe that the process prevents the publication of flawed articles and fraudulent research. Despite the criticisms, there are advantages of peer review. At present in medical journalism peer review process is an indispensable entity for assessing manuscripts intended for publication.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF Not available]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2426    
    Printed156    
    Emailed2    
    PDF Downloaded1    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal