Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 986 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Table of Contents   
Year : 2008  |  Volume : 14  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 135-138
Prevalence of celiac disease in Shiraz, southern Iran


1 Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2 Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Nemazee Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

   Abstract 

Background/Aim: This study was performed to evaluate the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) in Shiraz, southern Iran. Materials and Methods: Serum samples were collected from 1440 persons (age range = 20-83 years, mean age = 45.4 years) in 2004 and screened for endomysial and tissue transglutaminase antibodies. A questionnaire was completed for all subjects in relation to gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and cases with positive serology were requested to undergo small-bowel biopsy. Results : Seven cases (0.5%) were positive for IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG), and only two (0.14%) were positive for IgA anti-endomysial antibody (anti-EMA), both of whom had highly positive anti-tTg levels (40.4 and 48.0 IU/l). The major clinical symptoms of CD, such as recurrent abdominal pain and change in bowel habits were present in all patients with positive anti-tTG assays. Only five subjects with positive serology agreed to undergo upper GI endoscopy and duodenal biopsy. Three of these cases were reported with Marsh I histologic findings, while in the two cases with positive serologic anti-EMA, more advanced forms of CD were present. Conclusion: The prevalence of CD in apparently healthy adults was lower than the reported series from northern parts of the country; therefore, we suggest a more long-term follow-up study in high-risk groups, especially in the apparently healthy subjects in our region.

Keywords: Anti-endomysial antibody (anti-EMA), anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody (anti-tTG), celiac disease, southern Iran

How to cite this article:
Saberi-Firouzi M, Omrani GR, Nejabat M, Mehrabani D, Khademolhosseini F. Prevalence of celiac disease in Shiraz, southern Iran. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2008;14:135-8

How to cite this URL:
Saberi-Firouzi M, Omrani GR, Nejabat M, Mehrabani D, Khademolhosseini F. Prevalence of celiac disease in Shiraz, southern Iran. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2019 Sep 22];14:135-8. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2008/14/3/135/41732


Celiac disease (CD), also called gluten-sensitive enteropathy and nontropical sprue, is a common autoimmuine disorder characterized by an immune response to ingested gluten. [1] Until a few years ago, this disorder was considered to be almost exclusively affecting the people of European origin [2] ; however, recent reports from other regions of the world revealed similar rates of disease when actively searched for the disease by serological tests. [3] Although the diagnosis is usually easy in patients affected by typical symptoms of the disorder such as growth failure, loss of weight, diarrhea, and deficiency of various nutrients, most patients suffer from only subtle, if any symptoms, leading to difficulty in diagnosis. [4] According to the risk of the population under study, the prevalence may differ significantly. [5],[6],[7],[8] Some screening programs within healthy populations indicate that the disease is underdiagnosed in some areas; [9],[10],[11] however, others reported an overestimation. [5]

Until 1980s, CD was thought to be very rare in the Middle East [12],[13],[14] and was not considered as a possibility in the differential diagnosis of malabsorption syndromes. [15],[16] The daily ingestion of wheat, rye, and barely results in long-term extraintestinal sequels in subjects with undiagnosed or untreated CD. [5],[6] Therefore, the early detection of the disease and subsequent implications of gluten-free diet may be an appropriate method in prevention of its complications later in life.

To determine the prevalence of CD in our region, we screened the adult population in Shiraz, the largest city in southern Iran for presence of the disease by serological tests and histological study of small intestine.


   Materials and Methods Top


Subjects were randomly selected from the telephone directory of Shiraz in southern Iran with a population of around 1.5 million people, and were invited to participate in the study. The city was divided into 14 areas according to the first three digits of telephone number. Telephone number was randomly chosen from each area and 2000 individuals were invited to attend our study at Mottahari Gastroenterology Clinic affiliated to Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

All subjects were of Iranian ancestry. The Ethics Committee of the university approved the study and an informed written consent was obtained from each individual participating in this study. Data on past medical history and drug therapies were obtained from all subjects using a questionnaire. Cases with history of endocrine disorders, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, kidney dysfunction, collagen disease or autoimmune disease and those who were on hormone replacement or known drug therapies interfering with bowel function and affecting epithelium of intestines were excluded.

Study protocol

The study group was screened for anti-endomyosial (EMA) and tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibodies in blood samples obtained in early 2004 and all subjects with a positive result were asked to undergo upper GI endoscopy. The last biopsy specimen was obtained in December 2004.

Serum antibody tests

After the exclusion of abovementioned cases, the serum samples from 1440 persons were simultaneously assessed in a blind fashion in two different laboratories. Tests for anti-EMA and anti-tTG antibodies were conducted, respectively, in laboratories of Department of Immunology and Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Serum IgA anti-tTG was evaluated by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a commercial kit (Binding site, Minineph R, UK) and values ≥7 IU/l were considered as positive. Serum IgA class anti-EMA antibodies were evaluated by immunoflourescence assay (IFA). If the level of anti-tTG was <0.1 IU/ml, the total serum IgA level was measured for ruling out IgA deficiency.

Endoscopy

Upper GI endoscopy was performed using an Olympus Gastroscope, (GIF type Q20 ) at the Endoscopy Room of Department of Internal Medicine of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences by trained fellows or academic staff of the university. A pathologist obtained multiple duodenal biopsies for routine histological eosin studies. Histological evaluation was performed according to the Marsh classification and normal mucosa with <30 intraepithelial lymphocytes per 100 epithelial cells was considered as Marsh I, normal mucosa with more than 30 intraepithelial lymphocyte as Marsh II, and cases with villous atrophy as Marsh III. [17]

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software, version 11.5. Descriptive variables such as mean, median, and standard deviation were determined. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to find out the significance between low body mass index (BMI) in tTG-negative and tTG-positive groups. Chi-square (χ2 ) test was performed to find out the association between anti-tTG positivism and GI symptoms.


   Results Top


Our study was performed on 1440 subjects with an age range of 29-83 years (mean = 45.3 years). Seven subjects (1:180) were positive for IgA anti-tTG antibody and only two (1:720) were positive for IgA-class anti-EMA antibody, both of whom had highly positive tTG levels: 48.8 and 40.4 IU/l. From these, 1433 subjects were negative for both tests, and no one had undetectable total serum levels of IgA class antibodies of <0.1 IU/ml [Table 1]. The mean weight and height in the negative anti-tTG group were 68 kg and 146.93 cm and in the positive anti-tTG group were 67.63 kg and 161.15 cm, while the differences were not statistically significant.

The mean BMI in the negative and positive groups was 26.13 and 25.02, respectively; however, the difference was not statistically significant. All the subjects with positive anti-tTG had a history of GI symptoms; however, none of them had a biopsy-confirmed CD in the first-degree relatives. Recurrent abdominal pain and intermittent diarrhea were present in almost all the patients with positive anti-tTG test.

The review of five subjects who agreed to undergo upper GI endoscopy and duodenal biopsy revealed Marsh I in three and Marsh II in two cases, while both of them had high titers of anti-tTG level in serum samples.


   Discussion Top


Celiac disease is the most common food intolerance in the world, involving genetically predisposed individuals consuming gluten-containing cereals in their diet. The disease is present not only in Europe, but also in population of European ancestry (North and south of America and Australia), North Africa, Middle East, and south of Asia, where until a few years ago, it was historically considered extremely rare. [2]

In a study on apparently healthy population of northern and southern Iran, the prevalence of gluten-sensitive enteropathy (GSE) in 2799 individuals with mean age of 33.7 years (range = 18-66 years) was 29 cases who were positive for IgA tTG-antibody, whereas only five were simultaneously positive for anti-EMA. Except in two subjects with normal small bowel histology, all other subjects had biopsy findings compatible with GSE, with a prevalence of 0.96% or 1:104. [18] Another study in 2000 in Iranian healthy blood donors (1580 males, 420 females; mean age = 35.5 years, range = 18-65 years) reported a prevalence of 0.006% (1/166). [12] In other studies from northern Iran, a high prevalence of CD was noticed in high-risk groups such as patients with chronic diarrhea and diabetes mellitus. [19],[20] Although the reported series stated that the prevalence of CD was high in our country, few cases of CD were seen in our daily clinical practice, in spite of using newly developed serological tests such as anti-tTG that are available in most laboratories. Despite the application of simple serological tests in diagnosis of CD, there are few studies from Middle East countries addressing the prevalence of this disease in populations such as those in Syria and Israel. [14],[21]

Most of the reported cases of CD in India are from the northern part where wheat products are the staple diet. North Indians are possibly genetically prone to develop this disease. [22],[23],[24] In a recent study conducted on 2500 healthy blood donors in Tunisia, seven cases (1:355, 0.028%) of CD were reported. [25]

The newly developed ELISA tests for IgA anti-tTG antibodies are now widely available and are easier to perform and also less expensive than the immunofluorescence assay that is used to detect IgA anti-EMA antibodies. Anti-tTG antibodies are highly sensitive (95%) and specific (94%) for the diagnosis of CD. [26],[27] The diagnostic accuracy of anti-tTG immunoassays has been improved further by the use of human tTG instead of the nonhuman tTG preparations used in earlier immunoassay kits and up to 100% positive predictive value was also reported. [28],[29]

In a recent study from our country, the sensitivity and specificity of tests were 100% and 99% for the human-recombinant IgA tTG-antibody assays, respectively, whereas only in cases with positive IgA EMA, advanced mucosal lesions of the small bowel were detected in intestinal biopsy. They concluded that in a general population, the best screening test for detection of GSE is IgA tTG-antibody. [18] Therefore, most anti-tTG positive cases in recently published reports from Iran had low titers in serologic testing and Marsh III stage in histological evaluation. Some authors considered this rate of CD in Iran to be an overestimation and suggested a follow-up study of the cases. [30] We used the human type IgA class serum anti-EMA antibody test, which has also been validated in Europe, to identify untreated CD cases. [31] In our study, the cases with high titers of anti-tTG had positive anti-EMA and more advanced histological findings. This population-based study showed that the prevalence of CD in our region may not be similar to the prevalence in the so-called western countries or Europe, and it is also different from that reported by other studies in northern and other regions of Iran. However, if we base the diagnosis of CD on positive anti-tTG and anti-EMA associated with Marsh II or III histology, the prevalence of CD in our country will not be as high as those reported figures. Thus, we should reconsider our definition of CD because the economical burden of screening for even mild forms of disease will be high. Another important fact that should be considered will be the effects of dietary habits in different regions of the country. Rostami et al. [16] stated that agriculture of wheat that was started from modern Turkey, Iraq and Iran, slowly spreading to Europe, and showed that wheat consumption had a negative selective pressure on genes predisposing to CD. They reported a high prevalence of CD in the Middle East region. Wheat has been a major component of the Iranian diet for many centuries and continuous and high level of exposure to wheat proteins may result into some degrees of immune tolerance, leading to milder symptoms that may be misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome in some parts of the country. This may explain our findings and account for the difference with northern parts.


   Conclusion Top


We found that CD in our area is not prevalent as the northern parts of the country. High rates of CD in our country may be an overestimation of the disease and we suggest other studies to include serology, HLA typing, histology, and also follow-up studies in healthy people and high-risk groups to determine the true prevalence of CD in Iran.

 
   References Top

1.Torres MI, Lopez Casado MA, Rios A. New aspects in celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:1156-61.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Cataldo F, Montalto G. Celiac disease in the developing countries: A new and challenging public health problem. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:2153-9.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Hill I, Fasano A, Schwartz R, Counts D, Glock M, Horvath K. The prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk groups of children in the United States. J Pediatr 2000;136:86-90.  Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Chand N, Mihas AA. Celiac disease. Current concepts in diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006;40:3-14.   Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Farrell RJ, Kelly CP. Celiac sprue. N Engl J Med 2002;346:180-8.   Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Collin P, Kaukinen K, Vδlimδki M, Salmi J. Endocrinological disorders and celiac disease, Endocr Rev 2002;23:464-83.   Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Mδki M, Holm K, Lipsanen V, Hδllstr φm O, Viander M, Collin P, et al . Serological markers and HLA genes among healthy first-degree relatives of patients with coeliac disease. Lancet 1991; 338:1350-3.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T, Not T, Colletti RB, Drago S, et al . Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: A large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:286-92.  Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Csizmadia CG, Mearin ML, von Blomberg BM, Brand R, Verloove-Vanhorick SP. An iceberg of childhood coeliac disease in the Netherlands. Lancet 1999;353:813-4.  Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Korponay-Szabo IR, Kovacs JB, Czinner A, Goracz G, Vamos A, Szabo T. High prevalence of silent celiac disease in preschool children screened with IgA/IgG anti-endomysium antibodies. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1998;28:26-30.  Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Meloni G, Dore A, Fanciulli G, Tanda F, Bottazzo GF. Subclinical coeliac disease in schoolchildren from northern Sardinia. Lancet 1999;353:37.  Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Shahbazkhani B, Malekzadeh R, Sotoudeh M, Moghadam KF, Farhadi M, Ansari R, et al . High prevalence of celiac disease in apparently healthy Iranian blood donors. Eur J Gastroenterel Hepatol 2003;15:475-8.  Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Malekzadeh R, Akbari MR. Prevalence of gluten-sensitive enteropathy and coeliac disease in Iran. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;19:825-6.  Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Rawashdeh Mo, Khalil B, Raweily E. Celiac disease in Arabs. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nurt 1996;23:415-8.  Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Nasr K, Haghighi P, Abadi P, Lahimgarzadeh A, Hedayati H, Halstead JA, et al . Idiopathic enteropathy: An evaluation in rural Iran with an appraisal of nutrient loss. Am J Clin Nutr 1976;29:169-76.  Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Rostami K, Malekzadeh R, Shahbazkhani, Akbari MR, Catassi C. Celiac disease in Middle Eastern countries: a challenge for the evolutionary history of this complex disorder. Digest Liver Dis 2004;36:694-7.  Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Marsh MN. Gluten, major histocompatibility complex and the small intestine. A molecular and immunologic approach to the spectrum of gluten sensitivity ('celiac sprue'). Gastroenterology 1992;102:330-54.  Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Akbari MR, Mohammadkhani A, Fakheri H, Javad Zahedi M, Shahbazkhani B, Nouraie M, et al . Screening of the adult population in Iran for coeliac disease: Comparison of the tissue-transglutaminase antibody and anti-endomysial antibody tests. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;18:1181-6.  Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Shahbazkhani B, Mohamadnejad M, Malekzadeh R, Akbari MR, Esfahani MM, Nasseri-Moghaddam S, et al . Coeliac disease is the most common cause of chronic diarrhoea in Iran. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;16:665-8.  Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Shahbazkhani B, Faezi T, Akbari MR, Mohamadnejad M, Sotoudeh M, Rajab A, et al . Coeliac disease in Iranian type I diabetic patients. Dig Liver Dis 2004;36:191-4.  Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Challar MH, Jouma M, Sitzmann FC. Prevalence of asymptomatic celiac disease in a syrian population sample. JABMS 2004;6:155-60.  Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Sher KS, Frasar RC, Wicks AC, Mayberry JF. High risk of celiac disease in Punjabis. Epidemiological study in the south Asian and European populations of Leicestershire. Digestion 1993;54:178-82.  Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Freeman HJ. Biopsy-defined adult celiac disease in Asian-Canadians. Can J Gastroenterol 2003;17:433-6.  Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Agrawal S, Gupta A, Yachha SK, Muller-Myhsok B, Mehrotra P, Agrawal SS. Association of human leukocyte-DR and DQ antigens in coeliac disease: A family study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;15:771-4.  Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Mankai A, Landolsi H, Chahed A, Gueddah L, Limem M, Ben Abdessalem M, et al . Celiac disease in Tunisia: Serological screening in healthy blood donors. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2006;54:10-13.  Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Malekzade R, Sachdev A, Fahid Ali A. Celiac disease in developing countries: Middle East, India and North Africa. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005;19:351-8.  Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Dieterich W, Laag E, Schopper H, Volta U, Ferguson A, Gillett H, et al . Autoantibodies to tissue transglutaminase as predictors of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 1998;115:1317-21.  Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Sulkanen S, Halttunen T, Laurila K, Kolho KL, Korponay-Szabo IR, Sarnesto A, et al . Tissue trasnglutaminase autoantibody enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay in detecting celiac disease. Gastroenterology 1998;115:1322-8.  Back to cited text no. 28    
29.Troncone R, Maurano F, Rossi M, Micillo M, Greco L, Auricchio R, et al . IgA antibodies to tissue transglutaminase: An effective diagnostic test for celiac disease. J Pediatr 1999;134:166-71.  Back to cited text no. 29    
30.Stern M, Working Group on Serologic Screening for Celiac Disease. Comparative evaluation of serologic tests for celiac disease: a European initiative toward standardization. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2000;31:513-9.  Back to cited text no. 30    
31.Tonutti E, Visentini D, Bizzaro N, Caradonna M, Cerni L, Villalta D, et al . The role of antitissue transglutaminase assay for the diagnosis and monitoring of coeliac disease: A French-Italian multicenter study. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:389-9.  Back to cited text no. 31    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Mehdi Saberi-Firouzi
Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Nemazee Hospitial, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.41732

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]

This article has been cited by
1 Co-localization of gluten consumption and HLA-DQ2 and -DQ8 genotypes, a clue to the history of celiac disease
Elena Lionetti,Carlo Catassi
Digestive and Liver Disease. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Prevalence of celiac disease in Iranian patients with irritable bowel syndrome: A cross-sectional study
Ali Akbar Shayesteh,Eskandar Hajiani,Seyed Jalal Hashemi,Abdolrahim Masjedizadeh,Seyed Mahmod Latifi,Mehdi Shayesteh
Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2014; 15(1): 12
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Prevalence of celiac disease in healthy Iranian school children
Dehghani, S.M. and Haghighat, M. and Mobayen, A. and Rezaianzadeh, A. and Geramizadeh, B.
Annals of Saudi Medicine. 2013; 33(2): 159-161
[Pubmed]
4 Celiac disease: A disease with varied manifestations in adults and adolescents
Minakshi Sharma,Prashant Singh,Abhishek Agnihotri,Prasenjit Das,Asha Mishra,Anil K Verma,Arvind Ahuja,Vishnubhatla Sreenivas,Rajesh Khadgawat,Siddhartha Datta Gupta,Govind K Makharia
Journal of Digestive Diseases. 2013; 14(10): 518
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Coeliac disease in irritable bowel syndrome (Rome III) in Southeast Iran
Alireza Bakhshipour,Seyyed Kazem Nezam,Zahra Zakeri,Reza Gharibi,Ali Bahari,Mahmoud Ali Kaykhaei
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012; 13(1): 24
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Celiac Disease in the Developing World
Kassem Barada,Hussein Abu Daya,Kamran Rostami,Carlo Catassi
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 2012; 22(4): 773
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Celiac disease: Serologic prevalence in patients with irritable bowel syndrome
Mehdi, Z. and Sakineh, E. and Mohammad, F. and Mansour, R. and Alireza, A.
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences. 2012; 17(9): 839-842
[Pubmed]
8 Celiac Disease in the Developing World
Barada, K. and Abu Daya, H. and Rostami, K. and Catassi, C.
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America. 2012; 22(4): 773-796
[Pubmed]
9 Coeliac disease in irritable bowel syndrome (Rome III) in Southeast Iran
Bakhshipour, A. and Nezam, S.K. and Zakeri, Z. and Gharibi, R. and Bahari, A. and Kaykhaei, M.A.
Arab Journal of Gastroenterology. 2012; 13(1): 24-27
[Pubmed]
10 Prevalence of celiac disease among blood donors in sistan and balouchestan province, Southeastern Iran
Bahari, A., Karimi, M., Sanei-Moghaddam, I., Firouzi, F., Hashemi, M.
Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2010; 13(4): 301-305
[Pubmed]
11 Development of gastroenterology and hepatology in Iran: Part II-advances in research and therapeutic modalities
Saberifiroozi, M., Mir-Madjlessi, S.-H.
Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2009; 12(5): 516-525
[Pubmed]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusion
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5599    
    Printed103    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded495    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 11    

Recommend this journal