|Year : 2008 | Volume
| Issue : 3 | Page : 151-157
|Role of hematopoietic growth factors as adjuncts in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients
Fazal A Danish1, Salman S Koul2, Fazal R Subhani3, Ahmed E Rabbani4, Saeeda Yasmin5
1 Human Genetics Division, MP 808, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom
2 Department of Medicine (Unit-I), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Islamabad, Pakistan
3 Department of Pediatrics, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
4 Foundation University Medical College (FUMC), Rawalpindi, Pakistan
5 Department of Surgery (Unit-II), Rawalpindi General Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Click here for correspondence address and email
| Abstract|| |
Drug-induced hematotoxicity is the most common reason for reducing the dose or withdrawing ribavirin (RBV) and interferon (IFN) therapy in chronic hepatitis C, which leads to the elimination of a possible cure for the patient. Traditionally, severe anemia and neutropenia have been considered as absolute contraindications to start antiviral therapy. This has not however, been the case since the advent of adjunct therapy with hematopoietic growth factors (erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)). Some recent landmark studies have used this adjunct therapy to help avoid antiviral dose reductions. Although the addition of this adjunct therapy has been shown to significantly increase the overall cost of the treatment, this extra cost is worth bearing if the infection is cured at the end of the day. Although more studies are needed to refine the true indications of this adjunct therapy, determine the best dose regimen, quantify the average extra cost and determine whether or not the addition of this therapy increases the sustained virological response rates achieved, the initial reports are encouraging. Therefore, although not recommended on a routine basis, some selected patients may be given the benefits of these factors. This article reviews the current literature on this subject and makes a few recommendations to help develop local guidelines.
Keywords: Chronic Hepatitis C, hematopoietic growth factors, hemolytic anemia, neutropenia
|How to cite this article:|
Danish FA, Koul SS, Subhani FR, Rabbani AE, Yasmin S. Role of hematopoietic growth factors as adjuncts in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2008;14:151-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Danish FA, Koul SS, Subhani FR, Rabbani AE, Yasmin S. Role of hematopoietic growth factors as adjuncts in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2008 [cited 2020 Jun 5];14:151-7. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2008/14/3/151/41739
Ribavirin (RBV)-induced hemolytic anemia and interferon (IFN)-induced neutropenia are two well known side effects of antiviral therapy in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Some studies have estimated that these side effects are responsible for dose reductions in almost 40% , of the subjects with consequent 10-20% ,, reductions in the virological responses achieved. One study incriminated pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) as being directly responsible for suppressing hematopoiesis in all three cell lineages.  Cirrhosis with hypersplenism, history of blood cell count drop with prior antiviral therapy, lower baseline cell counts (Hb level £ 13 g/dL; neutrophil count £ 2900/mm 3 ; platelet count <170 000/mm 3 ) at the initiation of antiviral therapy, obesity and old age are considered to be the major risk factors for the development for hematotoxicity with RBV and IFN.  Based on these observations, there is a renewed interest in the use of hematopoietic growth factors (HGFs) in patients undergoing antiviral therapy. Only a few studies have been conducted on the pros and cons of the use of HGFs, and data is still considered insufficient to recommend their routine use.  This review article aims to discuss the current trends in the rationale, protocols and pros and cons of use of HGFs as an adjunct in the management of chronic hepatitis C. For this review, a literature search was made on 10/April/08 on PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases (key words: chronic hepatitis C, hemolytic anemia, neutropenia, and hematopoietic growth factors), the public websites of the US Food and Drug Administration and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) manufacturers, as well as safety advisories. American  and Canadian  consensus guidelines on the management of chronic hepatitis C, and American Society of Oncology guidelines on the use of Epoetin and Darbepoetin  were also consulted.
| Erythropoietin|| |
Anemia due to RBV,  interferons,  myelosuppression and relatively impaired endogenous HGF production is a major problem in patients receiving combination antiviral therapy.  It appears to be the most common cause of dose reductions or discontinuation of combination therapy.  It could be potentially life-threatening in patients with ischemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease.  In almost 25-30%  of the subjects, reductions in RBV doses (primary strategy for anemia management) are required, which negatively impacts the sustained virological response (SVR) rates. ,,,, In some recent studies, erythropoietin (EPO) use has been shown to attain pretreatment Hb levels in the majority of the patients, thus avoiding dose reductions/discontinuation of therapy. ,,,,, Besides increased erythropoiesis, EPO has also been shown to increase platelet counts.  Although the initial results are encouraging, more studies are needed to definitely recommend erythropoietin in all cases.
Anemia usually develops within the first four weeks of starting antiviral therapy and persists until the end of the course.  Almost 40% patients suffer a drop in Hb concentration of ≥ 3 g/dL.  Most published studies recommend RBV dose-reduction if Hb level falls to or below 10 g/dL. The dose-reduction should be gradual, i.e ., 800 mg/d for genotype 1 or 600 mg/d for genotype 2 or 3; further dose reductions to 600 mg/d or 400 mg/d for genotypes 1 and 2 or 3, respectively, should be done if Hb levels fail to rise after four weeks. The minimum effective dose of RBV appears to be 10.6 mg/kg/day;  thus, any dose reduction below this level should be considered irrational. An Hb level of 8 g/dL warrants drug withdrawal (not dose reduction).
Possible indications for EPO therapy include a fall in Hb level by >4 g/dL, Hb levels of <11 g/dL, and patients developing symptoms and signs of anemia (palpitations, dyspnea, easy fatigability, pallor).  If limited hematotoxicity (in the form of the above mentioned indications for EPO therapy) persists despite reducing the RBV dose to 10.6 mg/kg/day (the minimum effective dose),  initiation of EPO therapy may be considered.
As is shown by data from the lead-in phase of the HALT-C trial, the most critical period when adequate RBV dosage is highly desirable to achieve reasonable early virological response (EVR) and SVR rates is the first 12 weeks of antiviral therapy.  Dose reduction after 12-20 weeks may not be so crucial as far as effect on SVR rates is concerned.  Based on this, it seems reasonable to believe that EPO therapy is most required during the first 12 weeks of RBV therapy to maintain adequate RBV dosage.
A recent paper  demonstrated no change in SVR unless the overall dose of ribavirin falls below 60% of the recommended dose. It also showed that in patients who achieve an RVR (negative HCV RNA at week 4), even further reductions in the ribavirin dose may not impact SVR rates.
The US Food and Drug Administration-approved starting dose of epoetin is 150 U/kg three times per week or 40,000 U weekly subcutaneously; that of darbepoetin 2.25 µg/kg weekly or 500 µg every three weeks subcutaneously. Epoetin and darbepoetin are considered equivalent in therapeutic efficacy and safety. , The health-related quality of life (HRQL) systematic review  evaluated the effect of different dosing strategies on the safety and effectiveness of epoetin and darbepoetin. According to this review, there is no evidence to support doses or dosing schedules other than those recommended by FDA.  The aim of EPO therapy should be to maintain an Hb level of >11 g/dL (return to the pretreatment level is not the aim).  The first evidence of a response to EPO administration is an increase in the reticulocyte counts within ten days.  Since erythroid progenitors take several days to mature, a clinically significant increase in the hematocrit is usually not observed in less than two weeks and may require up to six weeks in some patients.  If no response ( e.g ., <1-2 g/dL rise in Hb or no diminution of transfusion requirements) occurs in 6-8 weeks despite an appropriate increase in the dose as per the US FDA-approved label, EPO therapy should be discontinued.  Although some trials have used baseline concentrations of endogenous erythropoietin as predictors of response,  the predictive power of such testing appears insufficient.  Thus, it is not recommended to use endogenous erythropoietin testing either to justify initiation of ESAs or to predict response to ESAs. 
If the rate of increase of hemoglobin content with ESA therapy is >1 g/dL over two weeks, EPO dose should be decreased. This is because a >1 g/dL rise in any two weeks during the course of the therapy has been associated with an increased risk of a thromboembolic phenomenon, predisposing the patient to myocardial infarction, stroke and even death.  Also, according to the manufacturer's recommendation, an Hb level of ³ 12 g/dL potentially increases the risk of thromboembolic phenomenon,  thus warranting dose adjustment. Administering ESA to achieve a target Hb of >12 g/dL has been shown to increase the risk for death and serious cardiovascular events.  This prompted the US FDA to add a black-box warning to the prescribing information for epoetin and darbepoetin in March 2007, instructing that the "dose should be adjusted for each patient to maintain the lowest Hb level sufficient to avoid the need for RBC transfusion and not to exceed 12 g/dL." Once an adequate Hb level (between 10-12 g/dL) is achieved, RBV dose can be increased to the optimum level. Once started, adjunct EPO therapy may be required until the end of the treatment.
Before starting EPO therapy, it is important to rule out its contraindications. These include uncontrolled hypertension, iron deficiency anemia and known hypersensitivity to mammalian cell-derived products or human albumin. Prior to initiating EPO therapy, it is recommended to check the patient's serum iron and ferritin (should be at least 100 ng/mL) levels and transferring saturation (should be at least 20%). Also, blood pressure should be adequately controlled and closely monitored during therapy. Although a well controlled seizure disorder is not considered to be a contraindication to antiviral therapy anymore, the safety and efficacy of EPO therapy in such cases have not been established. Also, it is not known whether or not it is safe to administer EPO in patients with underlying hematological disease ( e.g ., sickle cell anemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, or hypercoagulable disorders).
Excessive hemolysis with resultant increased compensatory erythropoiesis causes increased consumption of iron, folic acid and Vit B 12 . Deficiency of these agents is an important cause of failure/difficulty to achieve/maintain target Hb and hematocrit levels in patients receiving EPO therapy. Thus, these agents should also be co-administered in anemia patients, if found deficient. ,,
Currently, there is no consensus on the lower cut-off value of Hb level below which erythropoietin therapy should be commenced. In one randomized, double-blind study, Afdhal et al . proposed a cut-off value of 12 g/dL. Other studies have raised concerns on this value because of its cost-effectiveness.  One study used a cut-off value of 10 g/dL.  Whereas no local representative data is available on the normal levels of Hb in the Pakistani population, it appears that a cut-off value of 12 g/dL would practically mean giving HGF to >90% of our patients, which is definitely not cost-effective. It is suggested that probably an Hb level of £ 8g/d would be a more practicable marker to determine the need of HGF therapy in our population.
There are rare reports of development of pure-red-cell aplasia with epoetin-β therapy.  Although no definite cause for this side effect is known, it appears to develop secondary to the presence of anti-EPO antibodies. 
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) administration has been shown to increase the risks of venous thromboembolism (VTE) ,, and mortality. In one study, VTE events occurred in 334 out of 4610 patients treated with ESA as compared to 173 VTE events among 3562 control patients (7.5 vs 4.9%; relative risk = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.31-1.87); the mortality risk was also increased (hazard ratio = 1.10; 95% CI: 1.01-1.20).  As reported by a 2006 Cochrane Collaboration meta-analysis of 35 trials, epoetin or darbepoetin treatment was statistically significantly associated with increased risk for VTE events.  Practically, it means that while ESA therapy may confer a transfusion-sparing effect, this therapy also increases the probability of patients developing VTE events including deep vein thromboses, pulmonary emboli, myocardial infarctions, strokes, or transient ischemic attacks. Caution must therefore be exercised in administering ESAs to patients who are particularly prone to develop VTE, e.g ., patients with past history of thromboses, surgery, and prolonged periods of immobilization or limited activity. 
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent administration has also been shown to have harmful effects on survival and/or tumor outcomes in cancer patients. Many recent trails (BEST,  ENHANCE  and EPO-CAN-20  ) have demonstrated higher mortality and significantly shorter locoregional progression-free survival and time in the epoetin arm than in the placebo arm. Notably, the majority of these trials targeted an Hb level of >12 g/dL. This further explains the need to achieve and maintain an Hb level that is just sufficient to avoid RBC transfusions, and not to exceed 12 g/dL.
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) / Filgrastim
G-CSF is a 175 amino acid, highly purified, nonglycosylated protein produced by recombinant technology in a lab strain of E. coli by the addition of a gene expressing the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.  It induces neutrophil production,  differentiation  and release from the bone marrow.  Significant increases in the neutrophil counts can be observed within 24 h of G-CSF administration. It also appears to cause selected end-cell functional activation including enhanced phagocytic ability.  Other cell lines are affected by negligible proportions, if at all. Neutrophil levels usually normalize within 1-7 days (average four days). Studies however, have not shown any survival benefit. It appears that no effect - positive or negative - is produced on disease progression. Also, despite neutropenia being common, infective episodes are extremely rare in treated HCV patients.
G-CSF is primarily used in patients with nonmyeloid cancers (myeloid hemopathy is a contraindication to use G-CSF), undergoing bone marrow-suppressive cytotoxic chemotherapy, or in patients undergoing myeloablative therapy before bone marrow transplantation. The aim is to reduce the incidence, severity and duration of neutropenia. Besides avoiding/correcting neutropenia, an additional effect of G-CSF is the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells into the peripheral blood. These peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) may then be harvested and infused into patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy, either alone or in addition to bone marrow transplantation, with consequent rapid and more adequate hematological recovery.
Due to the known benefits of G-CSF in neutropenia patients, it has been tried in some recent studies in HCV-infected patients undergoing IFN therapy. The most common cause of interferon dose reductions in HCV-infected patients is IFN-induced neutropenia.  Some 30-50% of the subjects develop neutropenia within 1-2 weeks of starting the therapy. ,, The frequency appears to be higher with PEG-IFN when compared with nonPEG-IFN. , Reasonable results have been obtained when G-CSF has been tried in some studies  to avoid IFN dose reductions.
The current recommendation is to reduce the IFN dose if the neutrophil count falls to <0.5 x 10 9 /L, and discontinue it if it falls to <0.3 x 10 9 /L. 8 The minimum effective dose of PEG-IFN appears to be 1 µg/kg/week. G-CSF therapy may be considered if neutrophil counts remain <0.5 x 10 9 /L despite reducing the PEG-IFN dose to the minimum effective level.
G-CSF is commercially available in the form of sterile‚ clear‚ colorless‚ preservative-free liquid for parenteral administration. The product is available in single-use vials and prefilled syringes containing either 300 mcg or 480 mcg Filgrastim at a fill volume of 1.0 or 1.6 mL, respectively. A suggested dose regimen is starting G-CSF therapy at a dose of 300 mcg subcutaneously (SQ) once weekly, and then adjusting the dose as per the response/requirement. The aim should be to maintain a neutrophil count of ³1000 cells/µL (return to the pretreatment level is not the aim). Whereas most patients respond adequately to a G-CSF dose of 300 mcg SQ once weekly, almost 1/3 rd of all cases require dose adjustments. Some patients may require up to 480 mcg Filgrastim SQ thrice weekly; others may only need 150 mcg Filgrastim SQ once weekly. Complete blood counts should be taken twice or thrice weekly to judge the response to therapy. Once an adequate neutrophil count is achieved, IFN dose can be increased to the optimal level. Once started, adjunct G-CSF therapy may be required until the end of the treatment. In one study,  the median duration of G-CSF therapy was 20 weeks (range: 9-45).
No international consensus currently exists on the lower cut-off value of neutrophil counts below which the risk of development of serious infections is high enough to warrant initiation of G-CSF therapy. , Whether or not neutropenia increases the risk of infection is also debatable. One study showed an average fall of 34% in the neutrophil count with no documented or suspected ensuing bacterial infection.  Another study demonstrated that infections neither correlate with the nadir of neutrophil count ( <1,000 or > 750/mm 3 ) nor with the magnitude of neutrophil count fall from the baseline.  This is in contrast to the observations made in immunodeficient cirrhotics,  HIV carriers  and liver transplant patients,  in whom prolonged neutropenia has been associated with the development of bacterial infections warranting the cessation of antiviral therapy. The frequency of development of superadded bacterial infection secondary to neutropenia appears to be lower in the black population.  Also, these patients have an intrinsically low white cell count before treatment. Hence, the lower cut-off value ought to be lower in black patients. Interestingly, Puoti et al . demonstrated that the frequency of nonrespiratory infections may increase with PEG-IFN therapy, independent of the neutrophil count. 
G-CSF is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to E coli -derived proteins, including Filgrastim or any of its components. However, in general, this drug is generally well tolerated. Common side effects include bone/muscle aches and nausea and vomiting. The frequency of bone/muscle aches can be reduced by giving G-CSF either two days before or two days after interferon injection.  Rarely, splenomegaly and spontaneous splenic rupture have also been reported with G-CSF use. Thus, any patient reporting with left upper abdominal and/or shoulder tip pain should be evaluated for an enlarged spleen or splenic rupture. If neutropenic patients receiving G-CSF develop fever, dyspnoea and lung infiltrates, they should be evaluated for the possibility of adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Development of ARDS warrants immediate cessation of G-CSF therapy until the resolution of the symptoms.
There are conflicting reports regarding the cost-effectiveness of HGF therapy. Whereas one study reported an increase in the final cost by 43% with adjunct biotherapy with EPO and G-CSF7, another study suggested that as HGF therapy increases therapeutic compliance, improves quality of life, and avoids complications of chronic liver disease compared to the standard care, it is actually cost-effective.  Another study  showed that the cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year was $34,793 and $60,600 for genotype 1 and $33,832 and $64,311 for genotypes 2 or 3 for darbepoetin and epoetin, respectively. The net conclusion was that EPO therapy, especially darbepoetin therapy, is cost-effective for genotypes 1, 2 and 3. A cost analysis using a decision analysis model demonstrated that G-CSF use in HCV-infected genotype 1 cases is cost-effective, especially when given at a dose of 300 mcg SQ once weekly.  Most published cost-effectiveness studies assume that once started, patients continue to take HGFs for the remainder of hepatitis C therapy. However, the reality is that in a significant percentage of patients, withdrawal of HGF therapy may be possible much earlier without negatively affecting the SVR rates. In fact, in one study,  the median duration of EPO treatment was 24 weeks (range: 6-39). This makes HGF therapy even more cost-effective. One study showed that RBV dose reduction after 20 weeks of therapy does not significantly affect the final SVR rates achieved  even in nonresponders. If this finding is validated by other studies, it would mean that most patients would require HGF therapy only during the first 20 weeks, which still makes this option cost-effective.
IFN-induced thrombocytopenia and its treatment
IFN therapy is also known to cause a 10-50% fall in platelet counts. This fall is clinically insignificant in most cases. Possible mechanisms include decreased platelet production (due to relative thrombopoietin deficiency  and virus-induced bone marrow suppression , ) and increased peripheral destruction of platelets (both immune-mediated  and due to portal hypertension and hypersplenism)  . Thrombocytopenia appears to be more severe with PEG-IFN/RBV combination therapy as compared to IFN/RBV therapy. It is worst with PEG-IFN monotherapy  suggesting that some reactive thrombocytosis may be occurring secondary to RBV-induced anaemia.
The current recommendation is to reduce the IFN dose if the platelet count falls to <30 x 10 9 /L, and discontinue if it falls to <20 x 10 9 /L 8 . The minimum effective dose of PEG-IFN appears to be 1 mcg/kg/week. G-CSF therapy may be considered if platelet counts remain <30 x 10 9 /L in spite of reducing the PEG-IFN dose to the minimal effective level.
Recently, an oral thrombopoietin-receptor agonist, Eltrombopag (SB-497115, GlaxoSmithKline), has been shown to stimulate megakaryocyte proliferation and differentiation and to cause dose-dependent increases in platelet counts in chimpanzees and humans. ,,, A similar dose-dependent increase in platelet counts has been demonstrated by Eltrombopag in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura.  In one study,  whereas only 6% of HCV-related cirrhotics in the placebo group completed the 12 weeks antiviral course, the same was completed by 36, 53, and 65% of patients receiving 30 mg, 50 mg, and 75 mg of eltrombopag, respectively. Although the study was small and thus underpowered, the most commonly reported side effects (headache, dry mouth, abdominal pain, and nausea) were of insufficient severity to require discontinuation of the drug. Despite the encouraging initial results, further confirmation of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in phase 3 trials involving standard-duration courses of peginterferon and ribavirin is required.
| Conclusion|| |
Despite data being limited, it appears that HGF therapy improves the quality of life (QOL) across many domains (physical, mental, and social). , Although there is lack of SVR data, no respectable association recommends the routine use of HGF therapy . Based on the current evidence, it is quite reasonable to believe that, where indicated, adjunct therapy with HGFs helps to avoid antiviral dose reductions and attain optimum adherence (defined as the administration of bitherapy in an optimal dose, i.e ., PEG-IFN ≥1 mcg/kg/week and RBV ≥10.6 mg/kg/day for more than 80% of the prescribed duration). The possible net effect may be the attainment of higher SVR rates although more studies are needed to validate this. Studies have shown that HGF therapy is generally well tolerated. Further studies are needed to determine the lower cut-off values of Hb and neutrophil counts below which EPO/G-CSF therapy should be started. Also, more studies are needed to establish the right dosages and cost-effectiveness of HGF therapy.
| References|| |
|1.||Sulkowski MS. Anemia in the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:315-22. |
|2.||Dieterich DT, Spivak JL. Hematologic disorders associated with hepatitis C virus infection and their management. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:533-41. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|3.||Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, Rustgi VK, Shiffman M, Reindollar R, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A randomized trial. Lancet 2001;358:958-65. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|4.||Hadziyannis SJ, Papatheodoridis GV. Peginterferonalpha2a (40 kDa) for chronic hepatitis C. Exp Opin Pharmacother 2003;4:541-51. |
|5.||Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, Smith C, Marinos G, Goncales FL Jr, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med 2002;347:975-82. |
|6.||Peck-Radosavljevic M, Wichlas M, Homoncik-Kraml M, Kreil A, Hofer H, Jessner W, et al. Rapid suppression of hematopoiesis by standard or pegylated interferon-alpha. Gastroenterology 2002;123:141-51. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|7.||Lebray P, Nalpas B, Vallet-Pichard A, Broissand C, Sobesky R, Serpaggi J, et al. The impact of haematopoietic growth factors on the management and efficacy of antiviral treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus. Antivir Ther 2005;10:769-76. [PUBMED] |
|8.||Sherman M, Shafran S, Burak K, Doucette K, Wong W, Girgrah N, et al. Management of chronic hepatitis C: Consensus guidelines. Can J Gastroenterol 2007;21:25C-34C. [PUBMED] |
|9.||Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatology 2004;39:1147-71. |
|10.||Rizzo JD, Somerfield MR, Hagerty KL, Seidenfeld J, Bohlius J, Bennett CL, et al. Use of epoetin and darbepoetin in patients with cancer: 2007 American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:132-49. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|11.||Rebetol (RBV, USP) product information. Kenilworth, NJ: Schering Corporation; 2003. |
|12.||Tanaka N, Ishida F, Tanaka E. Ribavirin-induced pure red-cell aplasia during treatment of chronic hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1264-5. [PUBMED] |
|13.||Balan V, Wu GY, Muir AJ, Keeffe EB, Bowers PJ. Erythropoietin response to anemia is decreased in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) receiving combination therapy and PEG-IFN (RBV/PEG-IFN) therapy. Gastroenterology 2003;124:M1417. |
|14.||Afdhal NH, Dieterich DT, Pockros PJ, Schiff ER, Shiffman ML, Sulkowski MS, et al. Epoetin alpha maintains ribavirin dose in HCV-infected patients: A prospective, double-blind, randomized, control study. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1302-11. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|15.||Maddrey WC. Safety of combination interferon alfa-2b/RBV therapy in chronic hepatitis C-relapsed and treatment-naive patients. Semin Liver Dis 1999;19:67-75. [PUBMED] |
|16.||Reichard O, Schvarcz R, Weiland O. Therapy of hepatitis C: Alpha interferon and ribavirin. Hepatology 1997;26:108S-11S. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|17.||Chapko MK, Dominitz JA. Cost-effectiveness of growth factors during hepatitis C anti-viral therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:1067-77. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|18.||Pockros PJ, Shiffman ML, Schiff ER, Sulkowski MS, Younossi Z, Dieterich DT, et al. Epoetin alfa improves quality of life in anemic HCV-infected patients receiving combination therapy. Hepatology 2004;40:1450-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|19.||Thevenot T, Di Martino V, Lunel-Fabiani F, Vanlemmens C, Becker MC, Bronowicki JP, et al. Complementary treatments of chronic viral hepatitis C. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006;30:197-214. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|20.||McHutchison JG, Manns M, Patel K, Poynard T, Lindsay KL, Trepo C, et al. Adherence to combination therapy enhances sustained response in genotype-1-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2002;123:1061-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|21.||Hadziyannis SJ, Sette H Jr, Morgan TR, Balan V, Diago M, Marcellin P, et al. Peginterferon-alpha2a and RBV combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C: A randomized study of treatment duration and RBV dose. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:346-55. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|22.||Dieterich DT, Wasserman R, Brau N, Hassanein TI, Bini EJ, Bowers PJ, et al. Once-weekly epoetin alfa improves anemia and facilitates maintenance of ribavirin dosing in hepatitis C virus-infected patients receiving ribavirin plus interferon alfa. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2491-9. |
|23.||Shiffman ML, Price A, Hubbard S. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 with peginterferon alpha-2B (PEGIFN), high weight based dose ribavirin (RVN) and Epoetin alpha (EPO) enhances sustained virologic response (SVR). Hepatology 2005;42:217A. |
|24.||Talal AH, Weisz K, Hau T, Kreiswirth S, Dieterich DT. A preliminary study of erythropoietin for anemia associated with RBV and interferon-alpha. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2802-4. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|25.||Gergely AE, Lafarge P, Fouchard-Hubert I, Lunel-Fabiani F. Treatment of RBV/interferon-induced anemia with erythropoietin in patients with hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002;35:1281-2. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|26.||Younossi ZM, Ong JP, Collantes R, Assmann JS, Sjogren R, Sjogren M, et al. Darbepoetin alpha (DA) for RBV-induced anemia in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) treated with PEG-IFN and RBV (PEG-IFN/RBV): A preliminary analysis. Gastroenterology 2004;126:83A. |
|27.||Homoncik M, Jilma-Stohlawetz P, Schmid M, Ferlitsch A, Peck-Radosavljevic M. Erythropoietin increases platelet reactivity and platelet counts in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004;20:437-43. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|28.||Shiffman ML, Di Bisceglie AM, Lindsay KL, Morishima C, Wright EC, Everson GT, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have failed prior treatment. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1015-23. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|29.||Davis GL, Wong JB, McHutchison JG, Manns MP, Harvey J, Albrecht J. Early virologic response to treatment with peg interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003;38:645-52. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|30.||Reddy KR, Shiffman ML, Morgan TR, Zeuzem S, Hadziyannis S, Hamzeh FM, et al. Impact of ribavirin dose reductions in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 patients completing peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:124-9. |
|31.||Ross SD, Allen IE, Henry DH, Seaman C, Sercus B, Goodnough LT. Clinical benefits and risks associated with epoetin and darbepoetin in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Ther 2006;28:801-31. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|32.||Seidenfeld J, Piper M, Bohlius J. Comparative effectiveness of epoetin and darbepoetin for managing anemia in patients undergoing cancer treatment. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 3. (Prepared by Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0026.) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2006. |
|33.||Eschbach JW, Egrie JC, Downing MR, Browne JK, Adamson JW. Correction of the anemia of end-stage renal disease with recombinant human erythropoietin. N Engl J Med 1987;316:73-8. [PUBMED] |
|34.||Eschbach JW, Abdulhadi MH, Browne JK, Delano BG, Downing MR, Egrie JC, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin in anemic patients with end-stage renal disease. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:992-1000. [PUBMED] |
|35.||A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: Italian Cooperative Study Group for rHuEpo in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Br J Haematol 1998;103:1070-4. |
|36.||Singh AK, Szczech L, Tang KL, Barnhart H, Sapp S, Wolfson M, et al. Correction of anemia with epoetin alfa in chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2085-98. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|37.||Besarab A, Bolton WK, Browne JK, Egrie JC, Nissenson AR, Okamoto DM, et al. The effects of normal as compared with low hematocrit values in patients with cardiac disease who are receiving hemodialysis and epoetin. N Engl J Med 1998;339:584-90. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|38.||Khuri FR. Weighing the hazards of erythropoiesis stimulation in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2445-8. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|39.||Auerbach M, Ballard H, Trout JR, McIlwain M, Ackerman A, Bahrain H, et al. Intravenous iron optimizes the response to recombinant human erythropoietin in cancer patients with chemotherapy-related anemia: A multicenter, open-label, randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1301-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|40.||Henry DH, Dahl NV, Auerbach M, Tchekmedyian S, Laufman LR. Intravenous ferric gluconate significantly improves response to epoetin alfa versus oral iron or no iron in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy. Oncologist 2007;12:231-42. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|41.||Hedenus M, Birgegard G, Nasman P, Ahlberg L, Karlsson T, Lauri B, et al. Addition of intravenous iron to epoetin beta increases hemoglobin response and decreases epoetin dose requirement in anemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: A randomized multicenter study. Leukemia 2007;21:627-32. |
|42.||Bunn HF. Drug-induced autoimmune red-cell aplasia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:522-523. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|43.||Stravitz RT, Chung H, Sterling RK, Luketic VA, Sanyal AJ, Price AS, et al. Antibody-mediated pure red cell aplasia due to epoetin alfa during antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:1415-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|44.||Food and Drug Administration. Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Briefing Document. Safety Concerns Associated with Aranesp (darbepoetin alfa) Amgen, Inc. and Procrit (epoetin alfa) Ortho Biotech, LP, for the Treatment of Anemia Associated with Cancer Chemotherapy. 2004. |
|45.||ten Bokkel Huinink WW, de Swart CA, van Toorn DW, Morack G, Breed WP, Hillen HF, et al. Controlled multicentre study of the influence of subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin on anaemia and transfusion dependency in patients with ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Med Oncol 1998;15:174-82. [PUBMED] |
|46.||Thatcher N, De Campos ES, Bell DR, Steward WP, Varghese G, Morant R, et al. Epoetin alpha prevents anaemia and reduces transfusion requirements in patients undergoing primarily platinum-based chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 1999;80:396-402. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|47.||Bennett CL, Silver SM, Djulbegovic B, Samaras AT, Blau CA, Gleason KJ, et al. Venous thromboembolism and mortality associated with recombinant erythropoietin and darbepoetin administration for the treatment of cancer-associated anemia. JAMA 2008;299:914-24. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|48.||Bohlius J, Wilson J, Seidenfeld J. Erythropoietin or darbepetin for patients with cancer (review). The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2007. |
|49.||Leyland-Jones B, Semiglazov V, Pawlicki M, Pienkowski T, Tjulandin S, Manikhas G, et al. Maintaining normal hemoglobin levels with epoetin alfa in mainly nonanemic patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: A survival study. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5960-72. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|50.||Henke M, Laszig R, Rube C, Schδfer U, Haase KD, Schilcher B, et al. Erythropoietin to treat head and neck cancer patients with anaemia undergoing radiotherapy: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2003;362:1255-60. |
|51.||Wright JR, Ung YC, Julian JA, Pritchard KI, Whelan TJ, Smith C, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythropoietin in non-small-cell lung cancer with disease-related anemia. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:1027-32. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|52.||Zsebo KM‚ Cohen AM‚ Murdock DC‚ Boone TC, Inoue H, Chazin VR, et al. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: Molecular and biological characterization. Immunobiology 1986;172:175-84. |
|53.||Welte K‚ Bonilla MA‚ Gillio AP‚ Boone TC, Potter GK, Gabrilove JL, et al. Recombinant human G-CSF: Effects on hematopoiesis in normal and cyclophosphamide treated primates. J Exp Med 1987;165:941-8. |
|54.||Duhrsen U‚ Villeval JL‚ Boyd J‚ Kannourakis G, Morstyn G, Metcalf D. Effects of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on hematopoietic progenitor cells in cancer patients. Blood 1988;72:2074-81. |
|55.||Souza LM‚ Boone TC‚ Gabrilove J‚ Lai PH, Zsebo KM, Murdock DC, et al. Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: Effects on normal and leukemic myeloid cells. Science 1986;232:61-5. |
|56.||Weisbart RH‚ Kacena A‚ Schuh A‚ Golde DW. GM-CSF induces human neutrophil IgA-mediated phagocytosis by an IgA Fc receptor activation mechanism. Nature 1988;332:647-8. |
|57.||Fukuda A, Kobayashi H, Teramura K, Yoshimoto S, Ohsawa N. Effects of interferon-alpha on peripheral neutrophil counts and serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor levels in chronic hepatitis C patients. Cytokines, Cell Mole Ther 2000;6:149-54. |
|58.||Renou C, Harafa A, Cummins C, Muller P, Demattei C, Jouve E, et al. Threshold for neutropaenia in the adjustment of interferon treatment in HCV infection. Hepatology 2003;37:949-50. |
|59.||Renou C, Harafa A, Bouabdallah R, Demattei C, Cummins C, Rifflet H, et al. Severe neutropaenia and post-hepatitis C cirrhosis treatment: Is interferon dose adaptation at once necessary? Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1260-3. |
|60.||Soza A, Everhart JE, Ghany MG, Doo E, Heller T, Promrat K, et al. Neutropaenia during combination therapy of interferon alfa and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002;36:1273-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|61.||Shiratori Y, Yokosuka O, Nakata R, Ihori M, Hirota K, Katamoto T, et al. Prospective study of interferon therapy for compensated cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C by monitoring serum hepatitis C RNA. Hepatology 1999;29:1573-80. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|62.||Laguno M, Murillas J, Blanco JL, Martinez E, Miquel R, Sanchez-Tapias JM, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patients. AIDS 2004;18:F27-36. |
|63.||Ross AS, Bhan AK, Pascual M, Thiim M, Benedict Cosimi A, Chung RT. Pegylated interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin in the treatment of post-liver transplant recurrent hepatitis C. Clin Transplant 2004;18:166-73. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|64.||Puoti M, Babudieri S, Rezza G, Viale P, Antonini NG, Maida I, et al. Use of PEG-IFNs is associated with an increased incidence of infections during combination treatment of chronic hepatitis C: A side effect of pegylation? Antivir Ther 2004;9:627-30. |
|65.||Koirala J, Gandotra SD, Rao S, Sangwan G, Mushtaq A, Htwe TH, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor dosing in PEG-IFN alpha-induced neutropenia and its impact on outcome of anti-HCV therapy. J Viral Hepat 2007;14:782-7. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|66.||Spiegel BM, Chen K, Chiou CF, Robbins S, Younossi ZM. Erythropoietic growth factors for treatment-induced anemia in hepatitis C: A cost-effectiveness analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005;3:1034-42. [PUBMED] |
|67.||Del Rio RA, Post AB, Singer ME. Cost-effectiveness of hematologic growth factors for anemia occurring during hepatitis C combination therapy. Hepatology 2006;6:1598-606. |
|68.||Peck-Radosavljevic M, Wichlas M, Pidlich J, Sims P, Meng G, Zacherl J, et al. Blunted thrombopoietin response to interferon alfa-induced thrombocytopenia during treatment for hepatitis C. Hepatology 1998;28:1424-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|69.||Bordin G, Ballarι M, Zigrossi P, Bertoncelli MC, Paccagnino L, Baroli A, et al . A laboratory and thrombokinetic study of HCV-associated thrombocytopenia: A direct role of HCV in bone marrow exhaustion? Clin Exp Rheumatol 1995;13:S39-S43. |
|70.||Ballard HS. Hematological complications of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1989;13:706-20. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|71.||Pockros PJ, Duchini A, McMillan R, Nyberg LM, McHutchison J, Viernes E. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:2040- 5. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|72.||McCormick PA, Murphy KM. Splenomegaly, hypersplenism and coagulation abnormalities in liver disease. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2000;14:1009-31. [PUBMED] |
|73.||Luengo JI, Duffy KJ, Shaw AN. Discovery of SB-497115, a small-molecule thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonist for the treatment of thrombocytopenia. Blood 2004;104:2910. |
|74.||Jenkins JM, Williams D, Deng Y, Uhl J, Kitchen V, Collins D, et al. Phase I clinical study of eltrombopag, an oral, nonpeptide thrombopoietin receptor agonist. Blood 2007;109:4739-41. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|75.||Sellers T, Hart T, Semanik M, Murthyl K. Pharmacology and safety of SB-497115-GR, an orally active small molecular weight TPO receptor agonist, in chimpanzees, rats and dogs. Blood 2004;104:2063. |
|76.||Erickson-Miller CL, Luengo JI, Nicholl R. In vitro and in vivo biology of a small molecular weight TPO receptor agonist, SB-497115: Poster presented at the 96th American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting, Anaheim, CA, April 16-20, 2005. |
|77.||Bussel JB, Cheng G, Saleh MN, Psaila B, Kovaleva L, Meddeb B, et al. Eltrombopag for the treatment of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2237-47. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
|78.||McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Shiffman ML, Rodriguez-Torres M, Sigal S, Bourliere M, et al. Eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2227-36. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT]|
1156 57, Lyton Street, Adam-Jee Road, Rawalpindi
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|This article has been cited by|
||Outcome of combination antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus infection during therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia
| ||Ayyub, M. and El-Moursy, S.A. and Al-Abbas, F. |
| ||Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011; 17(4): 283-286 |
||Antiviral therapy in HCV-infected decompensated cirrhotics
| ||Danish, F. and Koul, S. and Subhani, F. and Rabbani, A. and Yasmin, S. |
| ||Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010; 16(4): 310-314 |
||Managing HCV infection in pediatric age group: Suggested recommendations
| ||Danish, F.A. and Koul, S.S. and Subhani, F.R. and Rabbani, A.E. and Yasmin, S. |
| ||Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010; 16(3): 230-235 |
||Considerations in the management of hepatitis C virus-related thrombocytopenia with eltrombopag
| ||Danish, F.A., Koul, S.S., Subhani, F.R., Rabbani, A.E., Yasmin, S. |
| ||Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010; 16(1): 51-56 |
||Diagnosis and treatment of HCV infection in children: Suggested recommendations for the development of local guidelines
| ||Danish, F.A. and Koul, S.S. and Subhani, F.R. and Rabbani, A.E. and Yasmin, S. |
| ||Pakistan Paediatric Journal. 2009; 33(4): 203-210 |
||Managing HCV/HIV coinfection
| ||Danish, F.A. and Koul, S.S. and Subhani, F.R. and Rabbani, A.E. and Yasmin, S. |
| ||Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2009; 30(2): 120-121 |
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||5038 |
| Printed||121 |
| Emailed||4 |
| PDF Downloaded||535 |
| Comments ||[Add] |
| Cited by others ||6 |