Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Ahead of print Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 728 


 
LETTER TO THE EDITOR Table of Contents   
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 68-69
Author's reply


Hospital and Research Centre, 18, Vishwalaxmi Housing Society, Kothrud, Pune 411 029, India

Click here for correspondence address and email
 

How to cite this article:
Desarda M P. Author's reply. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2009;15:68-9

How to cite this URL:
Desarda M P. Author's reply. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2009 [cited 2017 Oct 17];15:68-9. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2009/15/1/68/45070


Sir,

I am thankful to Naguib, et al. [1] for reading my article [2] with interest. I have gone through their comments carefully. However, it appears that the authors misunderstand the concept between the tension present at rest and the tension present during contraction of any normal muscle. As is well understood, the muscles of the human body are relaxed at rest and the tension (increased tone) is created only during contractions. The strip of the external oblique aponeurosis in our operation is also relaxed (without tension) at rest and the tension (increased tone) is created only during contractions. This is a normal physiological phenomenon. Therefore, our surgical technique is a tension-free inguinal hernia repair. This does not occur in the other described techniques of the pure tissue hernia repairs since the muscles are pulled down from their normal location to suture to the inguinal ligament. This creates tension on the suture line even at rest and, moreover, is aggravated in multiples during the contractions of those muscles.

Additionally, in my study, it is clearly stated that there was no recurrence or groin pain following the surgery. Therefore, it is misleading on the part of Naguib, et al. to state that we made a claim of a low recurrence rate. In a recent article dealing with a series of 860 patients having 920 inguinal hernias [2] with a follow-up period of more than 7 years, I have demonstrated that these results compared well with other international publications. Continuous non absorbable sutures were used in all my previous surgeries.

The thin fascia covering the external oblique aponeurosis helps to keep the fibers together, if at all there is any chance of separation. This basic property of the fascia is generally known to the readers.

Finally, with regard to the claim by the authors that the repair depends on the aponeurotic sheath of the external oblique as the only posterior layer and that the original weak posterior wall has been left repaired is incorrect. They also state that suturing the edge of the upper flap to the posterior wall does not strengthen the posterior wall muscles. However, the posterior wall is not formed by only transversalis fascia, as is generally described, but it is composed of two layers. Transversalis fascia forms the posterior layer and is papery thin without any strength except at some places where it is thickened to form the iliopubic tract. The second layer is in front and that is formed by the aponeurotic extensions from the transversus abdominis aponeurotic arch. [3],[4] There is no muscle in the posterior wall, as claimed by the authors, therefore, the question of strengthening the muscle does not arise. The sutured strip in the new technique replaces the absent or deficient aponeurotic element to form the new posterior wall. As such, their comment that the posterior wall is not repaired is incorrect. The statement by the author Naguib et al. that muscles run in different directions even in the inguinal canal region is also inaccurate and should be supported by evidence. The new concepts of the physiology of the inguinal canal based on surgical anatomy has been previously demonstrated in a series of 200 patients undergoing hernial repair surgery. [5]

Finally, issues like definition of discomfort was meant heavy feeling without pain and risk of inguinal floor dissection was meant trauma to iliac vessels or ilio-pubic vein or any aberrant vessel causing troublesome bleeding. Observations pertaining to "learning curve" or "interrupted sutures" in other no-mesh techniques are unwarranted since the article in question does not aim to compare this technique with another.[6]

 
   References Top

1.Naguib, et al . No-mesh Inguinal Hernia Repair with Continuous Absorbable Sutures: Is it a Step Forward or Backward? Saudi J Gastroenterol 2008;14:67-68.  Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Desarda MP. No-mesh inguinal hernia repair with continuous absorbable sutures: A dream or reality? A study of 229 patients. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2008;14:122-7.  Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Desarda MP. Physiological repair of inguinal hernia: A new technique (Study of 860 patients). Hernia 2006;10:143-6.  Back to cited text no. 3  [PUBMED]  
4.Anson BJ, McVay CB. Surgical anatomy. 5th ed. Vol. 1. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1971. p. 461-532.  Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Anson BJ, Morgan EH, McVay CB. Surgical anatomy of the inguinal region based upon a study of 500 body-halves. Surg Gynaecol Obstet 1960;111:707-25.  Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Desarda MP. Surgical physiology of inguinal hernia repair: A study of 200 cases. BMC Surg 2003;3:2.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]

Top
Correspondence Address:
M P Desarda
Hospital and Research Centre, 18, Vishwalaxmi Housing Society, Kothrud, Pune 411 029
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.45070

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1833    
    Printed84    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded226    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal