Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 2697 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 47-52
Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a secondary level of care in Saudi Arabia


1 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine at Al -Ahsa, King Faisal University - Al -Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
2 Family and Community Medicine Department, College of Medicine at Al -Ahsa, King Faisal University - Al -Ahsa, Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission01-Aug-2009
Date of Acceptance26-Mar-2010
Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2010
 

   Abstract 

Background/Aim: The first option for gallbladder surgery is laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The aim of this study is to analyze the outcomes for all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a secondary level of care. Patients and Methods: Between 2005 and 2008, 968 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed at King Fahad Hospital. We collected and analyzed data including age, gender, body mass index (kg/m 2 ), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, mode of admission (elective or emergency), indication for LC (chronic or acute cholecystitis [AC]), co-morbid disease, previous abdominal surgery, conversion to open cholecystectomy, complications, operation time, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Results : Nine hundred and sixty-eight patients had laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the center. There were 824 females and 144 males; the age range was 15-64 (mean 32.9± 12.7 years). The operating time was 45 to 180 min (median 85 min); the complication rate was 4.03% (39 patients). Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy could be performed safely in the majority of patients with cholelithiasis, by an experienced surgical team at a secondary level of care.

Keywords: Complications, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, morbidity

How to cite this article:
Al-Mulhim AS, Amin TT. Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a secondary level of care in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2011;17:47-52

How to cite this URL:
Al-Mulhim AS, Amin TT. Outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at a secondary level of care in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2019 Dec 15];17:47-52. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2011/17/1/47/74484


Surgeon Muhe from Germany (1985), and surgeon Mouret from France (1987), performed the first human laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) cases. [1],[2]

Epidemiological studies indicate that 70% to 80% of all cholecystectomy are now completed laparoscopically, and it is one of the most commonly undertaken procedures in general surgery. [3]

Several clinical and epidemiological studies suggest that the outcome of LC depends on factors such as age, gender, body weight, clinical presentation, previous abdominal surgery, and surgeon's experience. [4]

However, morbidity and mortality rates are usually used to evaluate the outcome in a surgery. [5],[6]

The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of LC at the secondary level of care in terms of morbidity.


   Patients and Methods Top


This is a record-based descriptive study carried out in Surgical Department at King Fahd Hospital over a period of 4 years from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2008. King Fahad Hospital at Hofuf is located in Al Hassa Governorate, Eastern Saudi Arabia, 350 km from Riyadh, with a population of about 1 million people. The hospital provides secondary level of care and represents the main referral center for diagnostic and surgical procedures in Al Hassa.

All records of patients of both genders and of those above the age of 12 years (< 12 years is considered pediatric in our hospital) who underwent LC irrespective of its indications were included in this study.

The collected data included age, gender, body mass index (kg/m 2 ), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, mode of admission (elective or emergency), indication for LC, co-morbid disease, previous abdominal surgery, diagnostic investigations, duration of the procedure, hospital stay, and complications.

Patient selection for surgery was made preoperatively based on history, physical, and laboratory diagnostic evidence of gall bladder disease.

Admitted patients were required to undergo the standard pre-operative tests liver function test, renal function tests, screening for hepatitis, blood sugar, and complete blood picture.

Ultrasonogram was routinely performed on all patients to confirm the clinical diagnosis of cholelithiasis with number of stones, sizes, gall-bladder wall thickness, and pericholecystic collection, and diameter of common bile duct.

Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, bronchial asthma, and cardiac disease were the most common co-morbid diseases found in this series.

LC was performed using the standard four-port technique advocated by Reddick; [6] the pneumo-peritoneum was created by the closed method, and diathermy of the gallbladder was performed with the monopolar electrosurgical hook in all cases.

During this study period, four consultant surgeons with vast experience in open surgery performed LC.

Data processing and analysis

Collected data were analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences (SPSS, version 13.0; Chicago, IL, USA). Categorical data were expressed in frequency and percentage; numerical data were expressed in medians, mean, and standard deviations. Univariate analysis and chi-square test were employed to determine possible correlates of the patient outcome and time along the period of study. Binary logistic regression analysis was generated by inclusion of significant variables at the univariate level to assess potential predictors of LC outcomes (occurrence of complications) in relation to patient's characteristics and pre-operative morbidity encountered taking the occurrence of operative and postoperative complications including conversion as the dependent variable.

Ethical considerations

Data confidentiality was maintained during all phases of data collection and analysis.


   Results Top


This hospital records-based study included 968 patients.

This study was carried out during the period 2005 to 2008, females represented nearly 85% of cases (female to male ratio of 5.8:1), the age of the included patients ranged from 15 to 64 years (mean 32.9± 12.7 years). Those in the age group of 20 to <40 years represented the main bulk of patients who underwent LC [Table 1].
Table 1: Basic and clinical preoperative patient characteristics

Click here to view


All patients were assigned an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status classification: 513(53%) were ASA I, 442 (45.7%) were ASA II, and 13 (1.3%) was ASA III.

[Table 2] shows the pre-operative status of the gall bladder and complications encountered following LC. Intra-operatively in 355(36.7%) patients, there was flimsy adhesion of the gallbladder. In 406(41.9%), gallbladder wall was found to be thickened (chronic cases), whereas in another 96(9.9%) cases gallbladder wall was inflamed (acute cholecystitis).
Table 2: Peri-operative status of the gall bladder and encountered complications following laparoscopic
cholecystectomy (year 2006-2008)


Click here to view


Distended gallbladders with mucocele were found in 31 (3.2%) patients which were decompressed laparoscopically.

Selective preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed in 26 cases because of obstructive jaundice, and a dilated common bile duct on ultrasound. In 19 cases in whom choledocholithiasis were present, it was managed with preoperative ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy [Table 1].

The operating time, from the time of insertion of the Verees needle to the end of skin closure of puncture wounds, ranged from 45 to 180 min (median 85 minutes).

Conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy was necessary in five cases. The reasons for conversion to open cholecystectomy were due to acutely inflamed and edematous gallbladder in two cases, bleeding from cystic artery in one case, and in two patients due to unclear anatomy of the operative field.

Postoperative bile leakage occurred in three patients (0.31%). All these patients had drains placed at the time of surgery. In two patients, it stopped on the fifth postoperative day, and one patient who continued to drain bile was successfully managed by endoscopic sphincterotomy and stent insertion.

In five patients, with acute cholecystitis and obscure anatomy, there were collections in Morrison's pouch. It was irrigation saline. All cases were successfully managed by non-surgical measures.

The follow up period ranged from 6 months to 40 months (median 28 months), and no late complications were detected.


   Discussion Top


LC is one of the most commonly undertaken procedures in general surgery since its inception in the early 1990s with low morbidity and mortality. [7] Large series of LC were reported with few complications.

In this study, pre-operative co-morbidities were found in 281 patients (29.0%). Type 2 diabetes was the most prevalent (18.6%); diabetes and hypertension were reported in 118 (12.2%), hypertension alone in 57 patients, coronary heart disease was found in 3.4% (of which 28 patients have had diabetes and hypertension), respiratory problems in the form of chronic asthma in5 patients, and obstructive diseases were also reported. This is similar to that reported by others. [8],[9]

[Table 1] shows the pattern of pre-operative; co-morbidities did not show significant trend in relation to the time period included.

Out of the 968 patients included, 340 patients (35.1%) were either overweight or obese based on their calculated body mass index (BMI), females constituted 67.1% of them. Obesity had no influence on the outcome of LC in this study, and this result is comparable to other studies that show no influence of BMI on the complications of LC. [8],[9],[10]

[Table 2] displays pre-operative status of gall bladder and the frequency of encountered complications, during the period of study. Among patients, multiple gall bladder stones were common (73.9%) than single stone, and common bile dilatation (>10 mm) reported in nine patients.

Obscure anatomy and adhesions were found in 36.7% of cases, acute cholecystitis in 9.9% of cases, and gangrenous gall bladder was found in 0.6%.

Wound infections and hematoma were the most common complications encountered post-operatively. The complication rate was 4.03% (39 patients) with insignificant trend in relation to year of operation.

The 1.9% overall conversion rate among the study patients is similar to that reported by others. [10],[11]

The operative time in minutes ranged from 45 to 180 min (median 85 min) and showed a significant trend over time as improvement was noticed in the shortening of operative time from year 2005 to 2008 (P = 0.047).

Hospital length of stay ranged from 1 to 13 days (for non-complicated cases a median of 2 days with a range of 1 to 3 days), while for complicated cases a minimum of four [4] and maximum of 13 days were reported.

[Figure 1] demonstrates the total percentages of all complications encountered and the rate of conversion to open operation in relation to year of operation. Complications and conversion rates showed some pattern (although it was consistent) of downward trend in relation to time but these trends were statistically insignificant.
Figure 1: Total percentages of all complications encountered and the rate of conversion to open operation in relation to year of operation

Click here to view


[Table 3] demonstrates both univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses. Female gender, the presence of co-morbidities, and multiple bladder stones, although increased the risk of complications, were found statistically insignificant at the univariate analysis.
Table 3: Univariate and multivariate analyses of determinants for laparoscopic cholecystectomy post-operative complications including conversion

Click here to view


Patients of older age (≥ 40 years), obese and overweight, dilated bile duct (include patients with history of cholangitis, pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice), presence of adhesions, and with acute bladder inflammation were found to be significant predictors to complications and unfavorable outcome during univariate analysis.

Binary logistic regression found that age of the patient (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.63), obesity (OR= 1.78), presence of dilated common bile duct (OR= 1.81), presence of adhesions (OR= 1.65), were all positive predictors for the development of post-operative complications and were included with patients who underwent LC.

The status of gall bladder failed to appear as a significant predictor in the logistic regression model although it was significant at the univariate analysis.

Epigastric port site hernias developed in three patients who were diagnosed within the first 6 months post-operatively.

The outcomes of this case series of LC performed at a secondary level of care were equivalent to those in the surgical literature from tertiary care settings. [2],[8],[11],[12],[13],[14]


   Conclusions Top


The results of this study confirm that LC at a secondary level of care in Saudi Arabia is a safe and effective intervention in selected patients with symptomatic gallstones, as in major teaching hospitals in Saudi Arabia. [9]

 
   References Top

1.Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2001;5:89-94.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Mouret P. Celioscopic surgery: Evolution or revolution? Chirurgie 1990;116:829-32.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.Livingston EH, Rege RV. A nationwide study of conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2004;188:205-11.   Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
4.Simopoulos C, Botaitis S, Polychronidis A, Tripsiani G, Karayiannakis AJ. Risk factors for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2005;19:905-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Russell EM, Bruce J, Krukowski ZH. Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring. Br J Surg 2003;90:527-32.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
6.Martin RC 2nd, Brennan MF, Jaques DP. Quality of complication reporting in the surgical literature. Ann Surg 2002;235:803-13.   Back to cited text no. 6
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Reddick EJ. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in freestanding outpatient centers. J Laparoendosc Surg 1992;2:65-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    
8.Osborne DA, Alexander G, Boe B, Zervos EE. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Past present, future. Surg Technol Int 2006;15:81-5.  Back to cited text no. 8
[PUBMED]    
9.Al-Mulhim AA. Male gender is not a risk factor for the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single surgeon experience. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2008;14:73-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
10.Angrisani L, Lorenzo M, De Palma G, Sivero L, Catanzano C, Tesauro B, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients compared with nonobese patients. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5:197-201.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]    
11.Bittner R. Laparoscopic surgery: 15 years after clinical introduction. World J Surg 2006;30:1190-203.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Giger UF, Michel JM, Optiz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krahenbόhl L. Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:723-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Salam IM, Own A, Kareem NA, Hameed OA, Yak CJ, Zaki KA. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Academy Medical Centre, Khartoum, Sudan. East Afr Med J. 2005;82:10-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    
14.Rather GM, Ravi VK. Audit of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a district general hospital. Saudi J Gastroenterol 1997;3:15-21.  Back to cited text no. 14
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  

Top
Correspondence Address:
Abdulrahman S Al-Mulhim
Department of Surgery, Medical College - Al-Ahsa, King Faisal University, P.O. Box 1164, Hofuf, Al-Hassa 31982
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.74484

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 Cholecystectomy for Biliary Dyskinesia: How Did We Get There?
Klaus Bielefeldt,Shreyas Saligram,Susan L. Zickmund,Anwar Dudekula,Mojtaba Olyaee,Dhiraj Yadav
Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Sex differences and outcomes of management of acute cholecystitis
Nikfarjam, M. and Harnaen, E. and Tufail, F. and Muralidharan, V. and Fink, M.A. and Starkey, G. and Jones, R.M. and Christophi, C.
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2013; 23(1): 61-65
[Pubmed]
3 Sex Differences and Outcomes of Management of Acute Cholecystitis
Mehrdad Nikfarjam,Efrant Harnaen,Farrukh Tufail,Vijayaragavan Muralidharan,Michael A. Fink,Graham Starkey,Robert M. Jones,Christopher Christophi
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2013; 23(1): 61
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Does sex affect the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy?: A retrospective analysis of single center experience
Khawar Kamran,Zia-ud-din Afridi,Rooh-ul Muqim,Jawad Khalil
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. 2013; 6(1): 21
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Laparascopic cholecstectomy at Myungsung Christian medical center, Ethiopia: A five-years experience
Bekele, S. and Biluts, H.
Ethiopian Medical Journal. 2012; 50(3): 251-257
[Pubmed]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Patients and Methods
    Results
    Discussion
    Conclusions
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2683    
    Printed137    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded384    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 5    

Recommend this journal