Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 436 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 19  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 121-125
Pepsin and bile acid concentrations in sputum of mustard gas exposed patients


1 Baqiyatallah Research Center of Gastroentrology and Liver diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Chemical Injuries Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 Respiratory Diseases and TB Research Center of Guilan University of Medical Science, Razi Hospital, Rasht; Advanced Thoracic Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran
4 Pulmonary Research Center, Ghaem Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
6 Young Researchers Club and Elites, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
7 Health Research Center, Baqiyatallah university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission17-Oct-2012
Date of Acceptance09-Feb-2013
Date of Web Publication16-May-2013
 

   Abstract 

Background/Aim: Gastro-esophageal reflux has been suggested to be associated with several pulmonary complications such as asthma, and post-transplant bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). Pepsin or bile salts in the sputum is shown to be an optimal molecular marker of gastric contents macro/micro aspiration. In this study, we investigated sputum pepsin as a marker of micro-aspiration in sulfur mustard (SM) exposed cases compared to healthy controls. Materials and Methods: In a case controlled study, 26 cases with BO and 12 matched healthy controls were recruited and all cases were symptomatic and their exposure to SM was previously documented during Iran-Iraq conflict. Pepsin levels in sputum and total bile acids were measured using enzymatic assay. The severity of respiratory disorder was categorized based upon the spirometric values. Result: The average concentration of pepsin in sputum was higher in the case group (0.29 ± 0.23) compared with healthy subjects (0.13 ± 0.07; P ± 0.003). Moreover, the average concentration of bile acids in the sputum cases was not significantly different in comparison to the controls ( P = 0.5). Conclusion: Higher pepsin concentrations in sputum of SM exposed patients compared with healthy control subjects indicate the occurrence of significantly more gastric micro-aspiration in SM exposed patients.

Keywords: Bile acid, gastro esophageal reflux, pepsin, sulfur mustard

How to cite this article:
Karbasi A, Goosheh H, Aliannejad R, Saber H, Salehi M, Jafari M, Imani S, Saburi A, Ghanei M. Pepsin and bile acid concentrations in sputum of mustard gas exposed patients. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2013;19:121-5

How to cite this URL:
Karbasi A, Goosheh H, Aliannejad R, Saber H, Salehi M, Jafari M, Imani S, Saburi A, Ghanei M. Pepsin and bile acid concentrations in sputum of mustard gas exposed patients. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2013 [cited 2020 Jun 2];19:121-5. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2013/19/3/121/111954


Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disorder caused by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus causing esophageal and extra-esophageal symptoms. Respiratory manifestations of GERD represent as one of the most considerable extra-esophageal symptoms. [1] GERD accompanied by regurgitation and aspiration has been suggested to contribute to several pulmonary complications including, asthma, chronic cough, recurrent pneumonitis and pathologic conditions of the pharynx and larynx such as laryngitis, chronic hoarseness, pharyngitis, and dental diseases. [2],[3],[4] It has also been associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis, connective tissue disease, and obstructive lung disease [5] and the development of post-transplant bronchiolitis obliterans (BO). [6],[7],[8]

Several mechanisms by which GERD causes pulmonary damage have been suggested. First, the refluxed content may stimulate chemoreceptors in the distal esophagus that can cause bronchial constriction and asthma-like symptoms via vasovagal activation. [9],[10],[11] Second pathway is the inflammatory reaction in the airways, mediated by release of interleukin (IL)-8 and recruitment of polymorpho nuclear leukocytes, as a result of the direct contact of gastric content to the lower airways. [12],[13] However, more evidence is available in favor of the second mechanism. [14],[15] Certain lung disorders such as cystic fibrosis and lung transplantation may accompany prolonged exposure of the bronchial epithelium to gastric contents due to impaired clearance mechanisms and mucous bronchial secretion function [16] that initiate an inflammatory reaction and further lung impairment through a defective cycle.

The major limitation of the study of reflux and aspiration in patients with pulmonary disease is the absence of a reliable diagnostic tool. Esophageal pH measurements are not sufficient for the evaluation of GERD. [15],[17] Impedance monitoring may be a superior measure of aspiration risk as it measures both acid and non-acid reflux episodes but it is hard to determine whether the gastric content have reached to the lungs to cause respiratory complications or not.

Molecular markers of aspiration, such as pepsin or bile salts in the saliva or sputum, are reported to be the optimal diagnostic tests. Pepsin measurement in the sputum/saliva collected at the time of symptoms provides a sensitive, non-invasive method for diagnosing GERD in patients with clinically suspected atypical GERD symptoms and its presence in sputum or saliva is considered to be pathologic. [18] Bile acids are also believed to cause lung injury and cytotoxicity, but their value as an aspiration marker remains controversial. [19],[20]

Respiratory problems are the greatest cause of long-term disability among patients with exposure to sulfur mustard (SM) and are mostly presented by a triad of cough, expectoration, and dyspnea. Previous collaborative studies have revealed that BO and bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia is the main long-term respiratory pathology in SM exposed cases [21],[22] and it is also demonstrated that reflux esophagitis is more frequent in these patients. [23] However, to date no study has been conducted to assess micro-aspiration in these patients. The aim of the present study was to investigate, the presence of pepsin as a marker of micro-aspiration in SM exposed patients and assessing their relationship with degree and severity of respiratory symptoms.


   Materials and Methods Top


Study design and participants

A total of 26 BO subjects with a history of SM exposure and 12 matched healthy cases were recruited between November 2008 and May 2009 at the Baqiyatallah Hospital, Tehran. Only SM exposed patients with atypical manifestations of GERD such as non-cardiac chest pain, hoarseness, chronic cough, and belching were considered for enrollment in this study. The diagnosis of BO was previously established with physical examination, spirometry and high resolute computed tomography (CT). A detailed questionnaire was completed by an investigator for each patient in order to obtain symptom information for typical and atypical symptoms.

All patients had been referred to the Departments of Cardiology, Otorhinolaryngology, or Pulmonology before enrollment in the present study to rule out other causes of respiratory symptoms. Exclusion criteria; any abnormality in chest radiograph, indicating the evidence for BO, a respiratory infection within 4 weeks of inclusion, gastric or esophageal surgery, evidence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy or other severe concomitant disease and heavy smoking. The control group consisted of 12 healthy non-smokers with negative allergic history, no clinical symptoms of upper or lower airway disease, and no typical GERD symptoms. Informed consent was obtained from all study subjects. Subjects were required to discontinue their anti-acid medications during a 2-week period. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Laboratory and spirometric assessment

Sputum samples were collected at the time of nocturnal cough, dyspnea attacks and after meal, from patients for pepsin measurement. Subjects were instructed to cough and clear the sputum, if there was lack of sputum, from the back of their throat and spit it into one of the tubes. Citric acid was used to maintain the sample at acidic pH after collection to stabilize the pepsin and to act as a simple antibacterial agent for the sample. Pepsin levels in sputum and total bile acids were measured by ELISA kit by adding the same concentration of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane to the standard curve samples as used in the sputum supernatants. The severity of respiratory disorder was categorized based upon forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) values as "mild" (FEV1 > 50%) "moderate" (50%>FEV1 > 30%) and "severe" (FEV1 < 35%). Para clinical examinations such as chest CT scan, pulmonary function tests and gastric endoscopy were conducted for all patients.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean and standard deviation. Differences between the patients and controls were estimated using independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square and or by the Kruskale Wallis test (for more than 2 groups), as appropriate. Bivariate correlations were assessed using Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients for normally and abnormally distributed data, respectively. All data were analyzed using SPSS version 10.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Ill., USA). A probability of P < 0.05 was considered as significant.


   Results Top


In total, 26 patients and 12 controls were evaluated in this study. The mean of age in case group was 44.5 years ± 6.2 years. All participants were male. 9 (36.6%) patients had mild, 14 (53.8%) moderate and 3 (11.5%) had severe respiratory impairment. High resolution computed tomography (HRCT) findings revealed air-trapping in 1-25% in 18 (72%) cases and in 25-50% in 4 (16%) patients. Esophageal wall thickening was the most prevalent finding in HRCT. Atypical reflux symptoms were observed in 84.6% of patients. Endoscopic findings included, erosive gastritis (60%), grade a reflux (42%), hiatal hernia (36%), grade b of reflux (16%) and grade c reflux (4%) in our patients [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographic and respiratory disorders data of volunteers

Click here to view


Pepsin and bile assay

The average concentration of pepsin in sputum was higher in the case group (0.29 ± 0.23) compared with healthy subjects (0/13 ± 0.07), (P = 0.003).

The average concentration of bile acids in the sputum of mustard gas (MG) exposed patients was not significantly different in comparison to the normal group (P = 0.5) [Table 2].
Table 2: The mean concentration of pepsin and total bile acids in all groups in comparison to controls

Click here to view


However, we couldn't find a significant association between clinical severity and pepsin ( P = 0.7) or bile acid (P = 0.4) concentration.


   Discussion Top


In this study, we concluded that SM exposed patients with chronic cough, suspected to have GERD appear to have more features of micro-aspiration than control subjects. Sputum bile acid concentrations were not significantly different between our patients and controls.

Gastric refluxed contents contain acid and pepsin both of which are deleterious to the laryngeal and pharyngeal mucosa. In previous studies, pepsin was found to reliably detect micro-aspiration in patients after lung transplantation in comparison to healthy people. [12] In the presence of acid, pepsinogen is transformed to pepsin and digests protein. Pepsin exhibits enzymatic activity at a pH level above 4 and is only irreversibly inactivated at a pH level greater than 6.5.

Pepsin has been reported to be present in the saliva and sputum of patients investigated for reflux. [24],[25] The micro-aspiration of gastro esophageal content and their pathogenic potential to induce severe lung damage was suggested in animal studies and some clinical studies of rare diseases. [26],[27],[28]

Bronchial epithelium is a recognized source of cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, which play an important role in normal lung function. However, several conditions are thought to impair its integrity. Blondeau et al., showed frequent presence of bile acids in saliva of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and increased the presence of bile acids in bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of lung transplantation patients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) or chronic rejection. D'Ovidio et al., showed that the presence of bile acids in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) is associated with increased levels of IL-8 and neutrophilia and risk of development of BOS. Other studies have shown an association between the presence of gastric contents in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of these patients and development of BOS. [26],[29],[30],[31] A possible role of retrograde aspiration after gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in the early development of BOS has been implicitly documented in the recent work from Cantu et al., [8] in which they show that, in lung transplant patients with known GER disease, early fundoplication led to significant improvements in freedom from the development of BOS. GER disease has also been associated with the development of BO-associated pneumonia or diffuse bronchiolitis in the non-lung transplant population. [32],[33]

In a previous study, we found that the frequency of both endoscopic and pathologic defined esophagitis was significantly higher in the patients with mustard-gas exposed patients than in controls. MG may directly damage the gastrointestinal via cholinergic effect, inflammatory reaction of mucosa, and delayed radiometric effects. [34] In addition, pulmonary defense mechanisms, including the cough reflex and mucociliary clearance of foreign bodies, are markedly impaired in SM exposed patients. It is conceivable that a prolonged contact time of aspirated gastric contents may therefore lead to substantially greater lung parenchymal injury. Moreover, while GERD may cause direct lung injury, it is also possible that it may play a role in augmenting the alloimmune response by creating an unregulated inflammatory environment in these patients.

It should be noted that the finding of pepsin or other possible markers of micro-aspiration in BALF does not necessarily conclude a causal relationship between GERD and pulmonary symptoms. On the other hand, other findings suggest that GERD could be secondary to anatomic changes following respiratory problems. [35],[36] In fact, pulmonary diseases promote the occurrence of esophageal reflux due to abnormal breathing physiology, thus forming the pathologic circle. A limitation of our study is that, the pepsin concentration of sputum may be under the influence of the procedure itself, as reported by Ervine and coworkers in a recent study on healthy children. [37],[38]


   Conclusion Top


Our findings of higher pepsin concentrations in induced sputum of MG exposed patients than healthy control subjects support the occurrence of significantly more gastric micro-aspiration in GER-related MG exposed patients. However, pepsin concentration in sputum does not appear to be correlated with severity of respiratory symptoms. Larger observational studies are needed to determine the clinical significance of aspiration in these patients and the diagnostic test that best predicts adverse outcomes.


   Acknowledgments Top


We thank all participants in this study.

 
   References Top

1.Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R, Global Consensus Group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1900-20.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Poelmans J, Tack J. Extraoesophageal manifestations of gastro-oesophageal reflux. Gut 2005;54:1492-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Jaspersen D, Kulig M, Labenz J, Leodolter A, Lind T, Meyer-Sabellek W, et al. Prevalence of extra-oesophageal manifestations in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: An analysis based on the Pro GERD Study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003;17:1515-20.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Weaver EM. Association between gastroesophageal reflux and sinusitis, otitis media, and laryngeal malignancy: A systematic review of the evidence. Am J Med 2003;115 Suppl 3A: 81S-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Tobin RW, Pope CE 2 nd , Pellegrini CA, Emond MJ, Sillery J, Raghu G. Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1804-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.Berkowitz N, Schulman LL, McGregor C, Markowitz D. Gastroparesis after lung transplantation. Potential role in postoperative respiratory complications. Chest 1995;108:1602-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Robertson AG, Ward C, Pearson JP, Corris PA, Dark JH, Griffin SM. Lung transplantation, gastroesophageal reflux, and fundoplication. Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:653-60.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Cantu E 3 rd , Appel JZ 3 rd , Hartwig MG, Woreta H, Green C, Messier R, et al. J. Maxwell chamberlain memorial paper. Early fundoplication prevents chronic allograft dysfunction in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:1142-51.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Harding SM. Gastroesophageal reflux: A potential asthma trigger. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2005;25:131-48.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Harding SM, Guzzo MR, Richter JE. The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in asthma patients without reflux symptoms. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:34-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Schan CA, Harding SM, Haile JM, Bradley LA, Richter JE. Gastroesophageal reflux-induced bronchoconstriction. An intraesophageal acid infusion study using state-of-the-art technology. Chest 1994;106:731-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Farrell S, McMaster C, Gibson D, Shields MD, McCallion WA. Pepsin in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid: A specific and sensitive method of diagnosing gastro-oesophageal reflux-related pulmonary aspiration. J Pediatr Surg 2006;41:289-93.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Kiljander TO, Salomaa ER, Hietanen EK, Ovaska J, Helenius H, Liippo K. Gastroesophageal reflux and bronchial responsiveness: Correlation and the effect of fundoplication. Respiration 2002;69:434-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Adhami T, Goldblum JR, Richter JE, Vaezi MF. The role of gastric and duodenal agents in laryngeal injury: An experimental canine model. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:2098-106.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.Ravelli AM, Panarotto MB, Verdoni L, Consolati V, Bolognini S. Pulmonary aspiration shown by scintigraphy in gastroesophageal reflux-related respiratory disease. Chest 2006;130:1520-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.Veale D, Glasper PN, Gascoigne A, Dark JH, Gibson GJ, Corris PA. Ciliary beat frequency in transplanted lungs. Thorax 1993;48:629-31.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.Sheikh S, Allen E, Shell R, Hruschak J, Iram D, Castile R, et al. Chronic aspiration without gastroesophageal reflux as a cause of chronic respiratory symptoms in neurologically normal infants. Chest 2001;120:1190-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.Kim TH, Lee KJ, Yeo M, Kim DK, Cho SW. Pepsin detection in the sputum/saliva for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with clinically suspected atypical gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Digestion 2008;77:201-6.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.D'Ovidio F, Mura M, Ridsdale R, Takahashi H, Waddell TK, Hutcheon M, et al. The effect of reflux and bile acid aspiration on the lung allograft and its surfactant and innate immunity molecules SP-A and SP-D. Am J Transplant 2006;6:1930-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.Tack J. Review article: The role of bile and pepsin in the pathophysiology and treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:10-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.Beheshti J, Mark EJ, Akbaei HM, Aslani J, Ghanei M. Mustard lung secrets: Long term clinicopathological study following mustard gas exposure. Pathol Res Pract 2006;202:739-44.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.Ghanei M, Tazelaar HD, Chilosi M, Harandi AA, Peyman M, Akbari HM, et al. An international collaborative pathologic study of surgical lung biopsies from mustard gas-exposed patients. Respir Med 2008;102:825-30.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.Ghanei M, Khedmat H, Mardi F, Hosseini A. Distal esophagitis in patients with mustard-gas induced chronic cough. Dis Esophagus 2006;19:285-8.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.Knight J, Lively MO, Johnston N, Dettmar PW, Koufman JA. Sensitive pepsin immunoassay for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1473-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.Potluri S, Friedenberg F, Parkman HP, Chang A, MacNeal R, Manus C, et al. Comparison of a salivary/sputum pepsin assay with 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring for detection of gastric reflux into the proximal esophagus, oropharynx, and lung. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1813-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.D'Ovidio F, Mura M, Tsang M, Waddell TK, Hutcheon MA, Singer LG, et al. Bile acid aspiration and the development of bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1144-52.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.Kaneko T, Sato T, Katsuya H, Miyauchi Y. Surfactant therapy for pulmonary edema due to intratracheally injected bile acid. Crit Care Med 1990;18:77-83.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.Porembka DT, Kier A, Sehlhorst S, Boyce S, Orlowski JP, Davis K Jr. The pathophysiologic changes following bile aspiration in a porcine lung model. Chest 1993;104:919-24.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.Blondeau K, Mertens V, Vanaudenaerde BA, Verleden GM, Van Raemdonck DE, Sifrim D, et al. Gastro-oesophageal reflux and gastric aspiration in lung transplant patients with or without chronic rejection. Eur Respir J 2008;31:707-13.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.Hadjiliadis D, Duane Davis R, Steele MP, Messier RH, Lau CL, Eubanks SS, et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in lung transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 2003;17:363-8.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.Young LR, Hadjiliadis D, Davis RD, Palmer SM. Lung transplantation exacerbates gastroesophageal reflux disease. Chest 2003;124:1689-93.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.Matsuse T, Oka T, Kida K, Fukuchi Y. Importance of diffuse aspiration bronchiolitis caused by chronic occult aspiration in the elderly. Chest 1996;110:1289-93.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.Sadoun D, Valeyre D, Cargill J, Volter F, Amouroux J, Battesti JP. Bronchiolitis obliterans with cryptogenetic-like organizing pneumonia. Demonstration of gastro-esophageal reflux in 5 cases. Presse Med 1988;17:2383-5.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.Dacre JC, Goldman M. Toxicology and pharmacology of the chemical warfare agent sulfur mustard. Pharmacol Rev 1996;48:289-326.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.Mokhlesi B, Morris AL, Huang CF, Curcio AJ, Barrett TA, Kamp DW. Increased prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with COPD. Chest 2001;119:1043-8.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.Paleev NR, Isakov VA, Chereĭskaia NK, Ivanova OV. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and respiratory apparatus pathology: The evidence of interrelation and unsolved problems. Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk 2005;6:3-7.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.Richter JE. Role of the gastric refluxate in gastroesophageal reflux disease: Acid, weak acid and bile. Am J Med Sci 2009;338:89-95.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.Ervine E, McMaster C, McCallion W, Shields MD. Pepsin measured in induced sputum: A test for pulmonary aspiration in children? J Pediatr Surg 2009;44:1938-41.  Back to cited text no. 38
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Mostafa Ghanei
Chemical Injuries Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.111954

Rights and Permissions



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2281    
    Printed56    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded352    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal