Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 416 


 
Table of Contents   
LETTER TO EDITOR  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 79
Response to: Treatment prolongation or quadruple therapy:- Individualization by geographical region


Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication12-Jan-2016
 

How to cite this article:
Alsohaibani F, Al Ashgar H, Al Kahtani K, Peedikayil M, Alfadda A, Khan MQ, Kageri I. Response to: Treatment prolongation or quadruple therapy:- Individualization by geographical region. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016;22:79

How to cite this URL:
Alsohaibani F, Al Ashgar H, Al Kahtani K, Peedikayil M, Alfadda A, Khan MQ, Kageri I. Response to: Treatment prolongation or quadruple therapy:- Individualization by geographical region. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Jul 23];22:79. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2016/22/1/79/173764


Sir,

We read with interest the letter by Losurdo et al., which brings to attention a relevant issue regarding the poor response to 10-day sequential therapy (S10) in case of clarithromycin resistance (70.1% to 10%) compared with clarithromycin-susceptible strains (74.1% to 33.3%) in 14-day triple (T14) therapy arm. [1],[2] There was no clear reason behind this finding. However, as stated by the authors, the total number of strains resistant to clarithromycin in our study was low in both arms (10 in S10, and 3 in T14) and hence, the difficulty in obtaining concrete conclusions. Another possibility is that prolonged therapy with clarithromycin (14 days in T14 group rather than 10 days in S10 group) may theoretically help in overcoming the resistance to clarithromycin.

As outlined in our study, the rate of resistance to antimicrobials was high and this may be due to the "unfortunate" open access policy to antibiotics prescriptions in Saudi Arabia, reflecting the high resistance rate of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole (48.5%), clarithromycin (23.3%), amoxicillin (14.8%), and levofloxacin (11.1%). The very low level of tetracycline prescriptions, and unavailability of this antimicrobial in most of the pharmacies, has resulted in a low resistance rate of 2.3%. [2]

According to the Maastricht IV/Florence Consensus Report, the choice of firstline regimen in a given country should be driven by the local prevalence of H. pylori strains with clarithromycin resistance. Clarithromycin-containing triple therapy without prior susceptibility testing should be abandoned when the clarithromycin resistance rate in the region is more than 15%-20%. In the upcoming Maastricht V Consensus Report, a threshold of 15% has been recommended to define countries with high clarithromycin resistance rates, and consequently forsake clarithromycin-containing regimens such as triple and sequential therapies. [3]

We believe that the eradication rate of H. pylori can be optimized when treatment is prolonged to 14 rather than 7-10 days. However, adherence is a major challenge and most patients will not take the prescribed medications for more than 10 days. Given the high prevalence rate of clarithromycin resistance in our country, the best option for our patients would be either quadruple therapy or concomitant therapy with or without probiotics. [4],[5]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Losurdo G, Iannone A, Giorgio F, Lerardi E, Di Leo A, Principi M. A prospective trial in Saudi Arabia comparing the 14-day standard triple therapy with the 10-day sequential therapy for treatment of helicobacter pylori infection: A further confirmation of "Geographic Weight". Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016;22:20.  Back to cited text no. 1
  Medknow Journal  
2.
Alsohaibani F, Al Ashgar H, Al Kahtani K, Kagevi I, Peedikayil M, Alfadda A, et al. Prospective trial in Saudi Arabia comparing the 14-day standard triple therapy with the 10-day sequential therapy for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2015;21:220-5.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
3.
Malfertheiner P, Megraud F, O′Morain C, Atherton J, Axon A, Bazzoli F, et al. European Helicobacter Study Group. Management of Helicobacter pylori infection-the Maastricht IV/Florence consensus report. Gut 2012;61:646-64.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Zhu R, Chen K, Zheng YY, Zhang HW, Wang JS, Xia YJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of probiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:18013-21.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Hauser G, Salkic N, Vukelic K, JajacKnez A, Stimac D. Probiotics for standard triple Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e685.  Back to cited text no. 5
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Fahad Alsohaibani
Department of Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh
Saudi Arabia
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.173764

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed972    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded178    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal