Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 444 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 370-374
Colorectal cancer liver metastasis trends in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia


1 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2 Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3 Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
4 Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission13-Feb-2016
Date of Acceptance17-Jun-2016
Date of Web Publication27-Sep-2016
 

   Abstract 

Background/Aim: To elucidate colorectal cancer (CRC) disease patterns, demographics, characteristics, stage at presentation, metastases, and survival rates of patients, particularly those with liver metastases, at our center as the first report from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective, single-center database study based on the histological diagnosis of CRC in patients seen at the King Khalid University Hospital between 2007 and 2011. Results: 427 cases of CRC with a mean age at diagnosis of 55.47 ΁ 12.85 years, out of which 96% were resected. Stage II was predominant at presentation, followed by both stage III and IV, with the remainder being stage I. One hundred patients had distant metastases, of which the liver was the only location in 54 patients. Mean survival was 3.0 years. Overall survival rates for CRC patients with liver metastases who underwent resection were 30% at 2 years and 17% at 5 years, and the mean survival rate was 1.4 years. Conclusions: Both the mean survival rate of our CRC patients with resectable liver metastases and the 5-year survival rate of these patients are lower than global averages. This discrepancy is likely due to late diagnoses rather than more aggressive disease.

Keywords: Colon cancer, metastasis, Saudi Arabia, survival

How to cite this article:
Hassanain M, Al-alem F, Simoneau E, Traiki TA, Alsaif F, Alsharabi A, Al-Faris H, Al-saleh K. Colorectal cancer liver metastasis trends in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016;22:370-4

How to cite this URL:
Hassanain M, Al-alem F, Simoneau E, Traiki TA, Alsaif F, Alsharabi A, Al-Faris H, Al-saleh K. Colorectal cancer liver metastasis trends in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Oct 21];22:370-4. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2016/22/5/370/191142


Colorectal cancer (CRC) is considered to be the third most common malignancy worldwide. [1] It affects roughly 30-50 people per 100,000 individuals in the USA and Europe, [2] and roughly half of these patients develop metastases during the course of the disease. [3],[4] The liver is the predominant site of metastasis in CRC, and 25% of patients present with metastases at the time of diagnosis (synchronous). [4],[5],[6] Throughout the course of the disease, in particular after resection of the primary tumor, approximately half of all CRC patients develop liver metastases. [4],[5],[6] CRC rates are markedly lower in Africa and the Middle East, occurring at an estimated rate of 3-11 per 100,000 individuals. [7] Specifically, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the incidence of CRC is increasing from 6.6 per 100,000 individuals in 2003 [8] to over 12 per 100,000 individuals in 2008. [9]

In a recent meta-analysis by Kanakas et al., the global 3 and 5-year mean survival rates of CRC were estimated to be 57.6 and 40.3%, respectively; [10] however, 5-year survival rates in the USA are estimated to be greater than 65%. [11] In comparison, the 5-year survival rate of CRC in the KSA is reported to be 44.6%. [12] Survival rates have improved tremendously for CRC due to early detection, application of total mesorectal excision, and addition of radiochemotherapy. [13],[14] With respect to CRC patients with liver metastases, the estimated global mean 5-year survival is 38%, although this number varies dramatically from region to region. [10] Survival improvement for metastatic CRC is majorly due to the aggressive surgical approach in resecting all metastasis and the addition of effective systemic chemotherapy. [15] Despite increasing data pertaining to CRC incidence and survival in the KSA, information relating to the leading cause of death from this disease, namely liver metastasis, is currently scarce. [16] Therefore, the aim of this study is to elucidate CRC disease pattern and survival rates, particularly of patients with liver metastases, in the KSA population and to compare these figures to the global averages.


   Patients and Methods Top


This study was a retrospective, single-center database study based on the histological diagnosis of CRC. Inclusion criteria included all patients diagnosed with primary CRC between 2006 and 2012 at the King Khalid University Hospital, KSA. Data including patient demographics; location of primary tumor; tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging at presentation and grading; surgical intervention; disease-free period and recurrence; and final status of the patient at last follow-up were collected. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using JMP 11 statistical software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA). In this study, we used a marginal structural model to understand whether metastasis location and timing had an effect on the survival rate. Probability of metastasis was predicted using age, stage, site, and vascular invasion. The inverse of these probabilities were used as weights to construct an exponential survival model adjusted for metastasis location (lungs, liver, or both).


   Results Top


We conducted a retrospective analysis of histological diagnosis of CRC for primary CRC between 2007 and 2011. We retrieved 427 cases of CRC with a mean age ± standard deviation at diagnosis of 56 ± 13 years, with a slight male predominance (240 patients; 56.2%). With respect to the location of the primary tumor, the rectum was the least common site, occurring in 120 patients (28.1%), followed by the sigmoid colon (140 patients; 32.3%), and the remaining colon (148 patients; 37.7%); in 19 patients, localization data was missing. The mean size of the primary tumor was 5.1 ± 3.0 cm [Table 1].

Stage II was most common at presentation (127 patients; 31%), followed by stage III with 122 patients (30%) and stage IV with 100 patients (25%), with the remainder being stage I (59 patients; 14%) and unknown (19 patients; 4.46%). With respect to tumor differentiation, the majority of the tumors were moderately-differentiated adenocarcinomas (304 patients; 71.3%), followed by poorly-differentiated carcinomas (23 patients; 5.3%), well-differentiated adenocarcinoma (14 patients; 3.28%), and undocumented (86 patients; 20.8%). Vascular invasion was present in 81 patients (20.7%).
Table 1: Patients characters and results

Click here to view


Of the 427 patients, 409 underwent resection (96.0%), and 320 of these patients were followed up after surgery (computerized tomography [CT] scan and colonoscopy) for a mean of 3 years and a minimum of 1 year; there was no evidence of recurrence in 241 patients (75.31%), 79 (24.68%) patients among our follow-up patients had metastatic recurrence.

Patients had distant metastases on presentation (23.7%), and of these, the liver was the only location in 54 patients (54%). Other metastatic locations included the lung (20 patients; 20%), concomitant liver and lung (20 patients; 20%), and others (5 patients; 5%) [Figure 1]. Among the 54 patients with liver metastases, additional 12 patients developed liver metachronous disease, 35 underwent liver resection, and 9 underwent pulmonary metastatectomy for curative intent with available follow-up data.
Figure 1: Distribution of metastatic locations in our colorectal cancer patients (percentage)

Click here to view


A Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate the survival curve. Patients with missing follow-up data were removed from the analysis. The overall survival rates for CRC patients with resected liver metastasis were 30% at 2 years (77/192) and 17% at 5 years (38/192) [Figure 2]. The mean overall survival of CRC patients with resected liver metastases was 1.8 years [Figure 3].
Figure 2: Survival curve plot between stage on presentation

Click here to view
Figure 3: Overall survival curve plot between males and females

Click here to view


The survival rates between males and females showed no statistically significant differences. However, on univariate analysis, survival had a significant correlation with tumor grade, age group at presentation, and timing of metastasis (P < 0.05).

An exponential survival model was constructed to estimate survival adjusted for age, cancer stage (localized, regional, or distant), colon vs. rectal cancer, and whether or not there was vascular invasion. Stage was only significant with a negative effect on survival (P = 0.005) [Appendix Table 1a]. We also calculated the coefficient estimates to predict the hazard rates and its standard deviation, which in turn predicts the survival at time t [S (t)] [Appendix Table 1b].

To determine the time of metastasis, we present [Appendix Table 2] a description of stage and metastasis by survival rate.

For patients with metastasis, a subanalysis of a probability of metastasis location effect on survival calculations is shown in Appendix Table 3. The data suggests that the location has an effect on survival rate (P = 0.0001 for location and P < 0.0001 for timing).

[Additional file 1]


   Discussion Top


Several studies have attempted to determine the prognostic factors and provide recommendations for the treatment of CRC. In terms of allocation of new cases, CRC is the third most common cancer worldwide. [17] The incidence of this devastating disease is increasing each year in Asian countries and particularly in KSA. [18] However, data pertaining to the main cause of death from CRC-liver metastasis-from this region is sparse in the literature. In this study, we determined the mean survival rate of CRC patients in the KSA with resectable liver metastases.

Our cohort revealed a younger age of patients at the time of presentation, similar to the findings of other studies reported from the same region; [19] however, this is very different from published data from the Western society. Although a clear explanation is yet to be identified, one factor could be the general younger age of our population. [20]

We found the mean survival rate of CRC patients in our cohort to be approximately 2.94 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.69-3.1) years. However, it does not meet the global survival rate of 3.6 years. [10] Surprisingly, in our study, the 5-year survival rate of patients with resected liver metastasis was 17% whereas other studies have reported a survival rate of 50%. [21],[22],[23] Moreover, in the USA, survival of patients with resectable CRC liver metastasis is over 60%. [24] It is noteworthy that the survival rates of CRC liver metastasis patients in the KSA region are exponentially improving despite this discrepancy. In corroboration with the recent reports, our current study (2006-2012) supports the fact that the 5-year survival of CRC patients with metastasis is higher than a previous study from KSA (14.7%) conducted between 1994-2004. [12]

It is interesting to note that the current study had more stage I CRC cases (13.8% versus 10.1%) and far fewer stage II CRC cases (29.8% versus 63.9%). This suggests that CRC tumors are being detected earlier in the KSA population compared to older studies. This is supported by the report from Al-Ahwal et al., where 25.9% of patients presented with advanced disease at the time of diagnosis. [12] However, despite the increase in stage I CRC diagnosis in the KSA over the past 5 years, in the USA, over 25% of patients with CRC are diagnosed at stage I, a factor that undoubtedly contributes to their increased relative survival rates. [25]

One important caveat to this study is that the global synchronous metastasis rates for CRC patients is approximately 25%, which is higher than that reported for our cohort patients (13.3%). [26],[27] However, in contrary, a recent study reported that there is no significant prognostic benefit for patients with metachronous metastases compared to synchronous metastases, where synchronous metastases developed within the first 12 months from diagnosis. [28] Furthermore, recent studies suggest that metachronous metastases may be present at the time of initial diagnosis (i.e., metachronous metastases are actually the result of growth of subclinical synchronous metastases). If this hypothesis is correct, the total number of synchronous/metachronous metastases in the present study is approximately 30% (5 synchronous and 4 metachronous), which is roughly at par with global averages. [26],[27],[28] Other reasons for this aforementioned discrepancy may simply be different diagnostic criteria or sensitivity to detect the presence of synchronous metastases varying by region. In addition, in this study, 33.5% of patients developed metastasis, which is lower than the global average, suggesting that the shorter survival rates in KSA patients is more likely due to late diagnosis rather than more aggressive disease. [29]

The current study has been conducted in a tertiary hospital, a referral center for CRCs from all over the country, and all the samples are relevant to the study being exclusively from the Saudi population. However, we acknowledge that small sample size is a limitation of this study, with a potential bias in selecting more resectable patients when undergoing selection via the admission office. Current data that have been presented here are still preliminary, and thus, one has to be careful while extrapolating the results presented here to the entire KSA population. In addition, because no consideration was made regarding chemotherapy and its survival, it is possible that the varying chemotherapeutic modalities used in individual patients may influence the survival rates reported here. CRC is considered a preventable tumor because the lesions arise from precancerous polyps and other recognizable processes. [7] Thus, every effort should be made to identify both the presence of these lesions and also patients-such as those with inflammatory bowel disease-that are at a risk of developing CRC. [30] To further improve the trend of diagnosing CRC and to raise the survival rates globally, it is recommended to adopt a national screening program in the KSA region. In Australia, such a program resulted in significantly early diagnoses, and it is hypothesized that this translated into a reduction in CRC mortality. [31] Further evidence supporting this ideology is a recent study reporting that pathological markers corresponding to earlier detection, such as staging, tumor size, and tumor differentiation, are most likely to impact survival. [32] For CRC, early detection is critical; 5-year survival rates are well over 90% if detected at stage I. [24],[33]


   Conclusion Top


While the survival rates for patients with resectable CRC liver metastases in the KSA are lower than what is reported globally, we suggest that increased attention to surgical techniques and significant improvements in surgical care over time has possibly led to improvements in the survival rates of CRC patients in the country. Even though the long-term results for these patients are not yet known, our preliminary results indicate that early detection of CRC will increase survival rates. Continued efforts are necessary to elucidate the long-term results. Future studies should, therefore, compare the long-term results between the patients who received an early diagnosis with those who received a late diagnosis.

Acknowledgments

Nour Al-Malki, Malak Al-Zahrani, Saad Al-saaway, Hisham Mansi: Data collection. Biostatics provided by support from the Prince Naif Bin Abdulaziz Health Research Center. Mazen M. Hassanain and Faisal Al-Alem contributed equally to the work.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Schottenfeld D, Winawer SJ. Cancers of the large intestine In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, editors. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press; 1996. p. 813-40.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Abdalla EK, Adam R, Bilchik AJ, Jaeck D, Vauthey JN, Mahvi D. Improving resectability of hepatic colorectal metastases: Expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1271-80.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Donadon M, Ribero D, Morris-Stiff G, Abdalla EK, Vauthey JN. New paradigm in the management of liver-only metastases from colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res 2007;1:20-7.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Loyer EM, Ribero D, Pawlik TM, Wei SH, et al. Solitary colorectal liver metastasis: Resection determines outcome. Arch Surg 2006;141:460-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Rees M, Tekkis PP, Welsh FK, O′Rourke T, John TG. Evaluation of long-term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: A multifactorial model of 929 patients. Ann Surg 2008;247:125-35.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sandouk F, Al Jerf F, Al-Halabi MH. Precancerous lesions in colorectal cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2013;2013:457901.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
National Cancer Registry MOH, KSA. Cancer Incidence Report in Saudi Arabia in 2003. Riyadh; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Internation Cancer Screening Network. National Cancer Institute; 2013. Available from: http://appliedresearch.cancer.gov/icsn/colorectal/mortality.html [Last accessed 2013 Sep 27].  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kanas GP, Taylor A, Primrose JN, Langeberg WJ, Kelsh MA, Mowat FS, et al. Survival after liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: Review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors. Clin Epidemiol 2012;4:283-301.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Cancer Facts and Figures. American Cancer Society, Inc; 2013. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/STT/STT_0.asp [Last accessed 2013 Sep 26].  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Al-Ahwal MS, Shafik YH, Al-Ahwal HM. First national survival data for colorectal cancer among Saudis between 1994 and 2004: What′s next? BMC Public Health 2013;13:73.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Dahlberg M, Påhlman L, Bergström R, Glimelius B. Improved survival in patients with rectal cancer: A population-based register study. Br J Surg 1998;85:515-20.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Lee JL, Yu CS, Kim CW, Yoon YS, Lim SB, Kim JC. Chronological improvement in survival following rectal cancer surgery: A large-scale, single-center study. World J Surg 2013;37:2693-9.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Booth CM, Nanji S, Wei X, Biagi JJ, Krzyzanowska MK, Mackillop WJ. Surgical resection and peri-operative chemotherapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases: A population-based study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2016;42:281-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Pestana C, Reitemeier RJ, Moertel CG, Judd ES, Dockerty MB. The Natural History of Carcinoma of the Colon and Rectum. Am J Surg 1964;108:826-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol 2001;2:533-43.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Mosli MH, Al-Ahwal MS. Does the increasing trend of colorectal cancer incidence in jeddah reflect a rise in the kingdom of saudi arabia? Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:6285-8.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Alsanea N, Abduljabbar AS, Alhomoud S, Ashari LH, Hibbert D, Bazarbashi S. Colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia: Incidence, survival, demographics and implications for national policies. Ann Saudi Med 2014;35:196-202.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Augestad KM, Bakaki PM, Rose J, Crawshaw BP, Lindsetmo RO, Dørum LM, et al. Metastatic spread pattern after curative colorectal cancer surgery. A retrospective, longitudinal analysis. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39:734-44.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Fernandez FG, Drebin JA, Linehan DC, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA, Strasberg SM. Five-year survival after resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer in patients screened by positron emission tomography with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET). Ann Surg 2004;240:438-47.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Lee WS, Yun SH, Chun HK, Lee WY, Kim SJ, Choi SH, et al. Clinical outcomes of hepatic resection and radiofrequency ablation in patients with solitary colorectal liver metastasis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:945-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Choti MA, Sitzmann JV, Tiburi MF, Sumetchotimetha W, Rangsin R, Schulick RD, et al. Trends in long-term survival following liver resection for hepatic colorectal metastases. Ann Surg 2002;235:759-66.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison PM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer 2004;101:3-27.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Lang K, Korn JR, Lee DW, Lines LM, Earle CC, Menzin J. Factors associated with improved survival among older colorectal cancer patients in the US: A population-based analysis. BMC Cancer 2009;9:227.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
McMillan DC, McArdle CS. Epidemiology of colorectal liver metastases. Surg Oncol 2007;16:3-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Bengmark S, Domellof L, Hafstrom L. The natural history of primary and secondary malignant tumours of the liver. 3. The prognosis for patients with hepatic metastases from pancreatic carcinoma verified by laparotomy. Digestion 1970;3:56-61.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Hayashi M, Inoue Y, Komeda K, Shimizu T, Asakuma M, Hirokawa F, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis. BMC Surg 2010;10:27.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Schlag PM, Benhidjeb T, Stroszczynski C. Resection and local therapy for liver metastases. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2002;16:299-317.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Lewis JD, Deren JJ, Lichtenstein GR. Cancer risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1999;28:459-77.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Cole SR, Tucker GR, Osborne JM, Byrne SE, Bampton PA, Fraser RJ, et al. Shift to earlier stage at diagnosis as a consequence of the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. Med J Aust 2013;198:327-30.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Moghimi-Dehkordi B, Safaee A. An overview of colorectal cancer survival rates and prognosis in Asia. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2012;4:71-5.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
O′Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Colon cancer survival rates with the new American Joint Committee on Cancer sixth edition staging. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1420-5.  Back to cited text no. 33
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Mazen Hassanain
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh 11472, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.191142

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Patients and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1538    
    Printed13    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded211    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal