Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 526 


 
Table of Contents   
EDITORIAL  
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 397-398
Partial splenic embolization for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding: A potential long waiting to be tapped


1 Department of Liver Transplantation and Hepatology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
2 Department of Liver Transplantation and Hepatology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia; Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication12-Dec-2016
 

How to cite this article:
Sharma H, Al Hasan I, Al-Judabi B. Partial splenic embolization for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding: A potential long waiting to be tapped. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016;22:397-8

How to cite this URL:
Sharma H, Al Hasan I, Al-Judabi B. Partial splenic embolization for gastroesophageal variceal bleeding: A potential long waiting to be tapped. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Sep 17];22:397-8. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2016/22/6/397/195557


Variceal bleeding with cirrhosis is a potentially calamitous clinical situation that has an overall mortality risk of 10–20% which reaches up to 40% in Child Pugh C patients within the first 6 weeks of bleeding.[1] Despite controlling the acute bleeding, 60% of these patients are at risk of re-bleeding, and if left untreated will have a mortality risk of 33%.[2] Multiple reports have emphasized the application of splenic artery embolization as an alternate potential treatment of sinistral variceal bleeding.[1],[3] Complete splenic infarction can impair the body's ability to protect against encapsulated microorganisms by limiting antibodies and thus predisposing patients to sepsis.[3] Despite initial enthusiasm, severe complications of complete splenic infarction have prevented its global acceptance as a viable clinical treatment. Therefore, partial splenic arterial embolization (PSE) has been proposed because after the procedure; a portion of the splenic parenchyma is left viable to preserve the spleen's immunologic function.[4]

Since Spigos et al.[5] published the technique of PSE for hypersplenism, the evolution of technique expertise and experience of interventional radiologists over decades has resulted in a much safer and reliable procedure. The procedure can be now performed to embolize selective segments of the spleen, and accurate remnant splenic volume estimation can be achieved with the help of parenchymal phase angiography.[6] Moreover, quantitative evaluation of embolized volume during PSE can be done; digital subtraction angiography can instantly calculate the flow reduction after each injection of embolic material and relative blood flow can determine splenic embolized volume using video dilution technique.[7],[8]

PSE helps gradual decrease in splenic volume over months; decreases blood flow in splenic artery and reduces splenic portal vein pressure without altering portal blood flow; and yields rise in platelet count within 12–24 h and restores thrombopoietin production in cirrhotics.[9] The rise in platelet count can, thus, facilitate interferon therapy in cirrhotic patients, cirrhotic patients and minimize bleeding complications post invasive liver surgery or liver transplantation.

Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is the best available initial management for esophageal and gastric variceal bleeding, however, early recurrence remains the Achilles heel. Tanai et al.[10] published their case series comparing EVL and EVL + PSE for esophageal varices. The series demonstrated that EVL + PSE reduced the cumulative recurrence rate of varices to nearly half at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 year follow up. Cumulative recurrence rates of esophageal varices at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in patients undergoing PSE + EVL was 21.1, 37.0 and 58.1%, respectively, compared to those undergoing EVL alone 58.1, 70.7 and 80.4%, respectively. In the event acute gastrovariceal bleeding, PSE with balloon retrograde transvenous obliteration (BRTO) has been reported.[11] Pathophysiologically, PSE unmasks the protective effect of reduction of portal flow and rise in platelet count; thus, yielding clinical improvement in terms of variceal re-bleeds.[8]

In this issue of the Journal, Wang et al. performed a meta-analysis on the efficacy of partial splenic embolization on the management of gastroesophageal variceal hemorrhage.[12] The recent interest in PSE will probably mirror in clinical practice after publication of this level 1 evidence base. The overall clinical validity of the results of the analysis can be argued as the total number of studies included are six. Despite heterogeneity I 2 being 0%, the true homogeneity of the studies also remains a question in context as only one RCT was available to the authors. The analysis includes two studies from the same center published during different time periods; even though authors have taken all the efforts to address this, an overlap bias of patient population cannot be statistically eliminated. Despite limited published data, authors have effectively utilized the meta-analytic tools to prove that, with current evidence, there is a statistically significant superiority of combinational therapies over conventional therapies in preventing variceal recurrence and variceal hemorrhage, as well as prolonging overall survival.

Despite the enthusiasm, a word of caution needs to be taken into account regarding the complications from PSE. Post-embolization syndrome characterized by intermittent pyrexia, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite, and abdominal fullness can be witnessed in most of the patients (75–100%).[13]

We feel that with the new evidence, PSE might be utilized as an effective tool in the management of gastroesophageal variceal bleeding. Future evidence consolidates our belief or not, we shall follow it closely.

 
   References Top

1.
Cremers I, Ribeiro S. Management of variceal and nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2014;7:206-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Bosch J, Garcia-Pagán J. Prevention of variceal rebleeding. Lancet 2003;361:952-4.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Madoff DC, Denys A, Wallace MJ, Murthy R, Gupta S, Pillsbury EP, et al. Splenic Arterial Interventions: Anatomy, Indications, Technical Considerations and Potential Complications. Radiographics 2005;25:S191-211.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Link DP, Seibert JA, Gould J, Lantz BM. On-line monitoring of sequential blood flow reduction during splenic embolization. Acta Radiol 1989;30:101-3.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Spigos DG, Jonasson O, Mozes M, Capek V. Partial splenic embolization in the treatment of hypersplenism. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979;132:777-82.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Yoshida H, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Yamamoto K, Kaneko M, Kawano Y, et al. Long-term results of partial splenic artery embolization as supplemental treatment for portal-systemic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:43-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mei QL, Li YH et al. Preliminary study of clinical significance of intrasplenic arterial anastomoses. China J Med Imaging 1999;7:275-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Yoshida H, Mamada Y, Taniai N, Tajiri T. Partial splenic embolization. Hepatol Res 2008;38:225-33.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Hidaka H, Kokubu S, Saigenji K, Isobe Y, Maeda T. Restoration of thrombopoietin production after partial splenic embolization leads to resolution of thrombocytopenia in liver cirrhosis. Hepatol Res 2002;23:265.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Taniai N, Onda M, Tajiri T, Toba M, Yoshida H. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) combined with partial splenic embolization (PSE). Hepatogastroenterol 1999;46:2849-53.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Gianotti R, Charles H, Hymes K, Chandarana H, Sigal S. Treatment of gastric varices with partial splenic embolization in a patient with portal vein thrombosis and a myeloproliferative disorder. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:14495-9.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wang P, Liu R, Tong L, Zhang Y, Yue T, Qiao H, et al. Partial Splenic Embolization has Beneficial Effects for the Management of Gastroesophageal Variceal Hemorrhage. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2016;22:399-406.  Back to cited text no. 12
  Medknow Journal  
13.
Hadduck TA, McWilliams JP. Partial splenic artery embolization in cirrhotic patients. World J Radiol 2014;6:160-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Bandar Al-Judabi
Division of Gastroenterology, University Hospital, London, Ontario

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.195557

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1528    
    Printed24    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded491    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal