Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Ahead of print Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 138 


 
Table of Contents   
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW/META ANALYSIS  
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 222-228
Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitor administration on gastric mucosal atrophy: A meta-analysis


Department of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, China

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication17-Jul-2017
 

   Abstract 

Background/Aims: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal diseases. Recently, some studies have reported that PPIs can alter the gastric mucosal architecture; however, the relationship remains controversial. This meta-analysis study was designed to quantify the association between long-term PPI administration and gastric atrophy.
Materials and Methods: A PubMed search was conducted to identify studies using the keywords proton pump inhibitors or PPI and gastric atrophy or atrophic gastritis; the timeframe of publication searched was up to May 2016. Heterogeneity among studies was tested with the Q test; odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. P values were calculated by I2 tests and regarded as statistically significant when <0.05.
Results: We identified 13 studies that included 1465 patients under long-term PPI therapy and 1603 controls, with a total gastric atrophy rate of 14.50%. There was a higher presence of gastric atrophy (15.84%; statistically significant) in PPI group compared to the control group (13.29%) (OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00–2.41).
Conclusions: The pooled data suggest that long-term PPI use is associated with increased rates of gastric atrophy. Large-scale multicenter studies should be conducted to further investigate the relationship between acid suppressants and precancerous diseases.

Keywords: Gastric atrophy, meta-analysis, proton pump inhibitors

How to cite this article:
Li Z, Wu C, Li L, Wang Z, Xie H, He X, Feng J. Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitor administration on gastric mucosal atrophy: A meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2017;23:222-8

How to cite this URL:
Li Z, Wu C, Li L, Wang Z, Xie H, He X, Feng J. Effect of long-term proton pump inhibitor administration on gastric mucosal atrophy: A meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2017 [cited 2017 Aug 23];23:222-8. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2017/23/4/222/210837



   Introduction Top


Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal diseases because they reduce the gastric acid secretion by blocking the H+/K+-ATPase. PPIs include omeprazole, lansoprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole. The recognition of the role of Helicobacter pylori in the pathogenesis of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease as well as the development of H. pylori eradication therapies with high success rates has strongly reduced the need for long-term treatment with anti-secretory drugs. However, maintenance therapy with PPIs is still required for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Zollinger–Ellison syndrome.[1],[2]

Recent studies have suggested that long-term treatment with PPIs may accelerate the development of atrophic changes of the gastric mucosa, especially in H. pylori-infected individuals.[3] Those taking PPIs without H. pylori tend to have normal gastric mucosa, whereas those infected with the organism show changes ranging from mild to severe corpus atrophy. Thus, the histological effects are not a result of treatment with the drug itself but rather a consequence of infection. Nowadays, the long-term safety of these drugs has been extensively evaluated but not entirely established.

Previously, there have been several studies addressing the relationship between long-term PPI use and gastric atrophy. Interest in this phenomenon has been boosted by the possibility that the widespread and indiscriminate use of PPIs may expand the infected population at risk of developing gastric cancer. Some studies have reported positive associations,[4],[5],[6] while other studies have produced null results,[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] and none have suggested an inverse relationship. Moreover, increased corpus gastritis and a decrease in the activity of antral gastritis have been suggested as a consequence of long-term treatment.

To gain a better understanding of whether maintenance treatment of PPIs results in a different gastric mucosal atrophy compared to controls, we systematically reviewed the published studies and conducted a meta-analysis.


   Materials and Methods Top


Search strategy

The PRISMA guidelines for conducting meta-analysis were followed. A comprehensive search was conducted by two investigators (LZ and WC), using a combination of MeSH and free text terms incorporating the population, intervention and outcome, and the third investigator (FJ) confirmed and agreed with the result. The three investigators worked independently, at different times, and at different medical science information centers affiliated to the third affiliated hospital of Soochow University. The search strategy was as follows: PubMed search using the key words proton pump inhibitors or PPIs and atrophic gastritis or mucosal atrophy. The search was repeated several times. The last search was conducted on May 1, 2016. The relevant articles texts and reference lists were manually searched to broaden the scope of our findings. We evaluated the full-texts of papers published in English. No language restrictions were used. If the papers were in an other language, English abstracts were used. When further information was required from a potentially relevant manuscript, the corresponding authors were contacted by the reviewers.

Inclusion criteria

Articles resulting from these searches and relevant references cited in those articles were screened and assessed independently by two reviewers (LZ and WC) for eligibility. The following inclusion criteria were used:

  • Study design: published case-control and cross-sectional studies
  • Studies that provide raw data dealing with gastric mucosal atrophy in both PPI group and control group
  • Studies in which gastric mucosal atrophy was confirmed by endoscopic assessment or mucosal biopsy.


Exclusion criteria

  • Subset of a published article by the same authors
  • Studies limited to animals.


Data extraction

The three investigators who performed the literature search also independently performed data extraction. The first authors, year, and country of publication, study type, type of specimen, sample size were recorded for each included study. The numbers of patients with mucosal atrophy in the PPI group and the control group were collected. When data from one study was reported in more than one manuscript, only one was selected for the meta-analysis, according to the following criteria (applied consecutively): (1) availability of adjusted odds ratio (OR) estimates for diabetics and non-diabetics; (2) longer follow-up period (applicable to nested case-control and cross-sectional analyses); and (3) larger sample size. When the relationship between PPI use and gastric mucosal atrophy was reported in different articles referring to the same study, both were considered eligible, but only one was included in the meta-analysis.

Statistical analysis

Our meta-analysis consisted of three parts. The first part was an epidemiological description of gastric atrophy rate in the PPI treatment group and the second part was a subgroup of H. pylori status in each study. The third part was a statistical pooling of the PPI treatment and gastric atrophy risk estimates. The incidence rate and the OR were the two main parameters for these studies.

An unconditional logistic regression model was adopted to compare and adjust the gastric atrophy rate by two parameters: the duration of PPIs use and medicine used in each study (omeprazole, lansoprazole, esomeprazole). A McNemar test and Kappa test were adopted to estimate the diversity and consistency of the outcomes among the paired data extracted from available studies.

In this study, the random effects model or fixed effects model was used for meta-analysis, according to the heterogeneity between studies. Heterogeneity was tested by the Q test (P< 0.10 was considered indicative of statistically significant heterogeneity) and the I2 statistic (values of 25%, 50% and 75% were considered to represent low, medium, and high heterogeneity, respectively). The fixed effect model was used when there was no significant heterogeneity (I2<50%); otherwise the random effect model was used.[17] P values were calculated by I2 tests. All the reported P values are two-sided, and P values <0.05 were regarded as statistically significant for all included studies.

Calculation of dichotomous variables was carried out using the OR with the 95% confidence interval (CI) as the summary statistic. The Mantel–Haenszel method was used to combine ORs for the outcome parameters. Yate's correction was performed for studies containing a 'zero' value in one cell for the number of positive cases in one of the two groups.[18]

Publication bias was examined by a funnel plot of log OR against its standard error using Begg's test. The degree of asymmetry was tested statistically using Egger's unweighed regression asymmetry test. Publication bias was considered to exist if the rank correlation coefficient from Begg's test was close to 1, or the slope parameter from Egger's regression was high.[19]

Data manipulation and statistical analyses were undertaken using the Statistical Software Package (STATA) version 12.0 (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, USA, 2011).


   Results Top


Description of studies

A total of 102 potentially relevant publications up to May 1, 2016, were systematically identified through PubMed. Of these, 68 (66.67%) were excluded because they did not satisfy the inclusion criteria, or they failed to provide sufficient information to determine whether the criteria were satisfactory. An additional 21 articles were excluded because of a lack of full text, while two other articles were added after being identified from the reference lists of relevant articles [Figure 1]. There were a total of 13 studies included in the final analysis that were published between 1996 and 2010[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] and met our inclusion criteria [Table 1]. As for the detection methods, all studies used only biopsy.
Figure 1: Flow chart of the study design

Click here to view
Table 1: Descriptive characteristics of included studies on gastric atrophy in long-term PPIs use group and control group

Click here to view


The 13 studies included 1465 patients under long-term PPI therapy and 1603 controls, with a total gastric atrophy rate of 14.50%. We observed a statistically significant higher presence of gastric atrophy in the PPI group (15.84%) compared to the control group (13.29%); control group OR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.00–2.41 [Figure 2].
Figure 2: Association between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use and gastric atrophy risk (Odds Ratio; ORs). A total of 13 studies were selected for the analysis. Random-effects model was chosen to estimate the ORs after pooling due to the high heterogeneity among these studies (I2 =68.3%, P = 0.000). A significant, 1.55-fold (95% CI = 1.00–2.41) increased atrophy risk in patients under PPIs therapy was shown

Click here to view


Type of proton pump inhibitors

Different types of PPIs including omeprazole,[4],[5],[6],[7],[8],[10],[13],[15] lansoprazole,[5],[11],[12],[14] esoprazole,[16] and others [7],[9] were utilized in the included studies.

The pooled data showed that the gastric atrophy rate was different between the maintenance therapy group and control group possibly due to differences in the various pharmacokinetics or dosages used [Figure 3].
Figure 3: Subgroup analysis of different kinds of PPIs therapy

Click here to view


The subgroup analysis indicated higher gastric atrophy rates both in the omeprazole and lansoprazole groups when compared to the control groups (16.15% vs. 11.05%, P = 0.001; 22.03% vs. 20.33%, P = 0.012). Conversely, for esoprazole there was a lower rate of gastric atrophy in treatment group than control group (6.93% versus 9.48%).

H. pylori status

A subgroup analysis of nine studies that assessed H. pylori status was also undertaken [Table 2] and [Figure 4].
Table 2: Subgroup analysis of gastric atrophy in H. pylori-negative vs. H. pylori-positive patients under PPI therapy

Click here to view
Figure 4: Subgroup analysis according to Helicobacter pylori infection status

Click here to view


Among the 509 H. pylori-positive patients, atrophy of any degree was diagnosed in 155 (30.45%) patients at follow-up. Among the 628 H. pylori-negative patients, atrophy of the gastric mucosa of any degree was diagnosed in 39 (6.21%) patients at the last visit (mild to severe). The development of any degree of atrophy was strongly associated with H. pylori infection (OR = 8.96, 95% CI = 3.11–25.83).

In addition, our analysis suggests a significant relationship between the presence of gastric atrophy in H. pylori-infected patients after long-term PPI use (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.30–2.27). Moreover, there was a lower rate of gastric atrophy in H. pylori- negative patients after PPI maintenance therapy (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.40–0.91).

Corpus and antrum gastric atrophy

In patients treated with PPI maintenance therapy, biopsy specimens were obtained both from the antrum and corpus in six studies

[Table 3]. The gastric atrophy rate in the antrum was slightly higher (18.63%) than in corpus (14.68%) (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 0.49–4.70), gastric atrophy in the antrum had decreased (OR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.38–1.62), but had increased in the corpus (OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.55–2.37).
Table 3: Distribution of atrophy in the gastric antrum and corpus in patients receiving treatment with proton pump inhibitors

Click here to view


Description of atrophy incidence at baseline and after different periods of time

In our meta-analysis, we analyzed atrophy at different time periods of PPI therapy, although the information was insufficient to analyze [Table 4]. In the future, large-scale and multicenter studies are still needed to clarify whether more severe morphological changes occur with time under PPI use.
Table 4: Atrophy in the oxyntic mucosa under long-term PPI therapy at last-line visit

Click here to view


Publication bias

To measure publication bias, a funnel plot and Harbord's weighted linear regression test [Figure 5] and [Figure 6] were used. It suggested there was no publication bias (P = 0.008). A sensitivity analysis calculating the pooled ORs for the remainder of the studies showed that there was no heterogeneity.
Figure 5: Estimating publication bias by funnel plot

Click here to view
Figure 6: Harbord's weighted linear regression indicated a non-significant publication bias (P = 0.008)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Clinically, the most common indications for long-term PPI use are for the management of symptomatic GERD and for prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-associated upper gastrointestinal complications. Like several other prolonged treatments, concern has arisen regarding possible long-term effects, especially of neoplastic nature. We analyzed the published data investigating the association between PPI administration and gastric mucosal atrophy. Meta-analysis of 13 studies from across the globe suggested that the rate of gastric mucosal atrophy was higher in PPI use group than that in their counterparts.

PPIs are a group of drugs whose main action is a pronounced and long-lasting reduction of gastric acid production. Millions of individuals have been using these medications on a continuous or long-term basis.[20]

In the early days of PPI therapy, there was particular concern about hypergastrinaemia in response to profound acid inhibition and resultant endocrine cell hyperplasia with possible tumor formation.[21] Indeed, it was just such a consideration that led to the temporary halt of the clinical development of omeprazole, the first PPI, and the delay of its widespread introduction.[22] It is perhaps due to the difficulty in conducting such studies that to date only limited data are available on changes in gastric levels or gastric mucosal endocrine cell numbers after prolonged PPI administration.[4],[13] It may also lead to the bias of the results.

The question of whether long-term PPI treatment in H. pylori- infected patients accelerates the development of GA has been raised.[5],[23],[24],[25] By comparing H. pylori-infected persons taking PPIs with uninfected persons of a similar age receiving the same treatment, we found that there was a significant increase of gastric atrophy incidence in H. pylori-positive patients. Our results suggest that patients with GERD and H. pylori infection who are treated with PPIs are at an increased risk of severe gastric atrophy. Moreover, our data found a higher prevalence of gastric atrophy in H. pylori-positive patients after long-term PPI use but a lower prevalence of gastric atrophy in H. pylori-negative patients.

The role of H. pylori in chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer disease is well recognized, and further research revealed that chronic H. pylori- associated gastritis predisposed to gastric atrophy and gastric cancer. This usuallyaffects the antrum. But some patients may develop corpusatrophy. These subjects are thought to have a reduced parietalcell mass, that is, they are natural hyposecretors of acid, andso the H. pylori can find a suitable environment in the corpus, which is normally too acidic to enable survival of the bacterium.

PPI treatment can lead to H. pylori colonization reduction. However, recent studies have found that corpus inflammation was significantly intensified despite stable bacterial counts.[26] The number of neutrophils increased significantly in the lamina propria and epithelium. It has been shownin vitro that epithelial cells infected with live H. pylori secrete large amounts of interleukin-8, which has a strong chemoattractant effect on neutrophils.[27] Continuous neutrophil activation may lead to tissue destruction.[28] Moreover, removal of acid from the H. pylori colonized luminal surface of the oxyntic mucosa could affect penetration of bacterial toxins, especially unprotonated ammonia, through the gastric barrier, which may result in enhanced mucosal damage.[29] Chemical modifications of bacterial toxins in a less acidic environment or deeper location of H. pylori in the foveolae could exaggerate mucosal damage.

Importantly, those without known active H. pylori also may develop gastric atrophy while taking PPIs, suggesting that in some patients either H. pylori was not detected or overgrowth by non-H. pylori organisms may on occasion lead to the same outcome.[30]

It is well known that concurrent PPI treatment can cause an apparent change in the distribution of the organism with a corpus predominant colonization and result in active chronic corpus gastritis with atrophy. So we analyzed the combined results from two biopsy sites (antrum and corpus).

In our study, the follow-up visit of gastric atrophy in the antrum was decreased, while it increased in the corpus. In addition, gastric atrophy incidence in antrum was (insignificantly) slightly higher than in corpus under PPIs maintenance therapy, possibly due to the small sample size and sampling error, as atrophy can be only focal. So, multiple punch biopsies of each person's stomach should be performed to improve the atrophy scores in future studies.

Study limitations

First, the selection of the controls varied between studies, some studies involve patients who had H. pylori, while others may include patients with GERD. Second, since the papers included in the present meta-analysis were limited to those published and listed on PubMed through May 2016, it is possible that some relevant published or unpublished studies, which may have met the inclusion criteria, were missed. These overlooked studies may have corrected some inherent biases due to the study design. Third, a few of the studies used in the present meta-analysis had a small sample size that may affect the final results.

In conclusion, this meta-analysis revealed an association between the presences of gastric atrophy in long-term PPI treatment patients. These findings support the notion that H pylori eradication should be seriously considered before initiating long-term treatment with PPIs. Due to the limited number of studies and their small sample sizes, further research should be conducted to investigate the possible relation between long-term PPIs use and gastric atrophy.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the applied basic research project of Changzhou science and Technology bureau [NO.CJ20140047], and Changzhou High-Level Medical Talents Training Project [NO. 2016CZBJ046].

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Walsh JH, Peterson WL. The treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in the management of peptic ulcer disease. N Engl J Med 1995;333:984-91.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vigneri S, Termini R, Leandro G. A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1106-10.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Thomson AB, Sauve MD, Kassam N. Safety of the long-term use of proton pump inhibitors. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:2323-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Nelis F, Dent J. Long-term omeprazole treatment in resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease: Efficacy, safety, and influence on gastric mucosa. Gastroenterology 2000;118:661-9.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Eissele R, Brunner G, Simon B, Solcia E, Arnold R. Gastric mucosa during treatment with lansoprazole: Helicobacter pylori is a risk factor for argyrophil cell hyperplasia. Gastroenterology 1997;112:707-17.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Moayyedi P, Wason C, Peacock R, Walan A, Bardhan K, Axon AT, et al. Changing patterns of Helicobacter pylori gastritis in long-standing acid suppression. Helicobacter 2000;5:206-14.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Stolte M, Meining A, Schmitz JM, Alexandridis T, Seifert E. Changes in Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in the antrum and corpus during 12 months of treatment with omeprazole and lansoprazole in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998;12:247-53.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lundell L, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Pedersen SA, Thor K, Andersson A, et al. Lack of effect of acid suppression therapy on gastric atrophy. Nordic Gerd Study Group. Gastroenterology 1999;117:319-26.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Larkin CJ, Watson RGP, Sloan JM, Stevenson M, Ardill JE, Buchanan D. Distribution of atrophy in Helicobacter pylori-infected subjects taking proton pump inhibitors. Scand J Gastroenterol 2000;35:578-82.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Kuipers EJ, Nelis GF, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Snel P, Goldfain D, Kolkman JJ, et al. Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with reflux oesophagitis treated with long term omeprazole reverses gastritis without exacerbation of reflux disease: Results of a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2004;53:12-20.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Berstad AE, Hatlebakk JG, Maartmann-Moe H, Berstad A, Brandtzaeg P. Helicobacter pylori gastritis and epithelial cell proliferation in patients with reflux oesophagitis after treatment with lansoprazole. Gut 1997;41:740-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Hirschowitz BI, Haber MM. Helicobacter pylori effects on gastritis, gastrin and enterochromaffin-like cells in Zollinger-Ellison syndrome and non-Zollinger-Ellison syndrome acid hypersecretors treated long-term with lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:87-103.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Lamberts R, Brunner G, Solcia E. Effects of very long (up to 10 years) proton pump blockade on human gastric mucosa. Digestion 2001;64:205-13.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Geboes K, Dekker W, Mulder CJ, Nusteling K. Long-term lansoprazole treatment for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: Clinical efficacy and influence on gastric mucosa. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2001;15:1819-26.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Lundell L, Havu N, Miettinen P, Myrvold HE, Wallin L, Julkunen R, et al. Changes of gastric mucosal architecture during long-term omeprazole therapy: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;23:639-47.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Tulassay Z, Stolte M, Engstrand L, Butruk E, Malfertheiner P, Dite P, et al. Twelve-month endoscopic and histological analysis following proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori-positive patients with gastric ulcers. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010;45:1048-58.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Arena VC. A program to compute the generalized Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square for multiple 2 x J tables. Comput Programs Biomed 1983;17:65-72.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-34.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Jacobson BC, Ferris TG, Shea TL, Mahlis EM, Lee TH, Wang TC. Who is using chronic acid suppression therapy and why? Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:51-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Calabrese C, Fabbri A, Di Febo G. Long-term management of GERD in the elderly with pantoprazole. Clin Interv Aging 2007;2:85-92.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bardhan KD, Bishop AE, Polak JM, Romanska HM, Rowland A, Thompson M, et al. Pantoprazole in severe acid-peptic disease: The effectiveness and safety of 5 years' continuous treatment. Dig Liver Dis 2005;37:10-22.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Solcia E, Fiocca R, Havu N, Dalvag A, Carlsson R. Gastric endocrine cells and gastritis in patients receiving long-term omeprazole treatment. Digestion 1992;51:82-92.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Lamberts R, Creutzfeldt W, Struber HG, Brunner G, Solcia E. Long-term omeprazole therapy in peptic ulcer disease: Gastrin, endocrine cell growth, and gastritis. Gastroenterology 1993;104:1356-70.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Kuipers EJ, Lundell L, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, Havu N, Festen HP, Liedman B, et al. Atrophic gastritis and Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with reflux esophagitis treated with omeprazole or fundoplication. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1018-22.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Kuipers EJ, Uyterlinde AM, Pena AS, Hazenberg HJ, Bloemena E, Lindeman J, et al. Increase of Helicobacter pylori-associated corpus gastritis during acid suppressive therapy: Implications for long-term safety. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1401-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Brunner G, Arnold R, Hennig U, Fuchs W. An open trial of long-term therapy with lansoprazole in patients with peptic ulceration resistant to extended high-dose ranitidine treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1993;7:51-5.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Weiss SJ. Tissue destruction by neutrophils. N Engl J Med 1989;320:365-76.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Crabtree JE, Covacci A, Farmery SM, Xiang Z, Tompkins DS, Perry S, et al. Helicobacter pylori induced interleukin-8 expression in gastric epithelial cells is associated with CagA positive phenotype. J Clin Pathol 1995;48:41-5.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Graham DY, Genta RM. Long-term proton pump inhibitor use and gastrointestinal cancer. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2008;10:543-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Jin Feng
Department of General Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Changzhou, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou 213000
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_573_16

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed395    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded86    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal