Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 101 


 
Table of Contents   
ORIGINAL ARTICLE  
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 26  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 160-167
Circulating tumor cells in whole process management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a real-life setting


1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China
2 Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University; Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medical University, Nanjing, China
3 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, Jiangsu; Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Submission17-Jan-2020
Date of Acceptance26-Mar-2020
Date of Web Publication07-May-2020
 

   Abstract 


Background/Aim: Liquid biopsy is changing the diagnosis and treatment strategies of various neoplasms. However, the circulating tumor cells (CTCs) of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients with different disease process are not clear. To better understand the dynamic change of CTCs in GIST patients, we conducted a real-life setting study.
Patients and Methods: One-hundred fifty GIST patients were included. The isolation by size of tumor cell (ISET) method was employed to detect the CTCs/circulating tumor microemboli (CTM). Imatinib (IM) plasma concentration was detected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Multivariate and univariate analysis were used to analyze the effects of clinical characteristics on the positive rate of CTC and the number of CTCs/CTM.
Results: The positive rate of CTCs was 72%. The median number of CTCs and CTM was 4 and 0. Logistic multivariate regression analysis showed that tumor diameter was the only independent factor of the positive rate of CTCs (P < 0.05). The numbers of CTCs and CTM had intensive linear correlation (P < 0.001). Tumor diameter, Ki 67 expression and mitotic were related to the number of CTCs (P < 0.05). Patients with higher Ki 67 expression tend to have more CTM (P < 0.05). IM plasma concentration showed no influence to the CTCs/CTM (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: In the current study, we assessed the CTCs and CTM of GIST patients in various disease progressions and identified clinicopathological factors influencing the detection of CTCs and CTM. These results are instructive for clinicians to understand CTCs/CTM in GIST patients.

Keywords: Circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor microemboli, gastrointestinal stromal tumors, imatinib plasma concentration

How to cite this article:
Zhang Q, Xu K, Chen M, Miao Y, Wang N, Xu Z, Xu H. Circulating tumor cells in whole process management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a real-life setting. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2020;26:160-7

How to cite this URL:
Zhang Q, Xu K, Chen M, Miao Y, Wang N, Xu Z, Xu H. Circulating tumor cells in whole process management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in a real-life setting. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 9];26:160-7. Available from: http://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2020/26/3/160/283935

Qiang Zhang, Kangjing Xu, Ming Chen and Yongchang Miao contributed equally





   Introduction Top


Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the most common mesenchymal tumors of digestive system, account for 80% of the digestive mesenchymal tumors.[1] After the “Patient Zero” treated with imatinib (IM) by Dr. Heikki, the management of GIST patients has entered a brand new era.[2] Since the IM was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an option for GIST patients, the median survival has been greatly prolonged compared with GIST patients before the IM era.[3] At the moment when precision treatment is prevalent, where 85% of GIST patients with KIT exon 11 mutations can benefit from the IM treatment, the management of GIST patients on IM is not completely satisfactory. During IM administration, especially for the elderly GIST patients, the dose change rate is about 16.7%.[4] The methods to assess the efficacy of GIST patients treated with IM are very limited, such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the validity of which have a hysteretic effect.[5] In several recent studies, we have focused on the effect of IM plasma concentration on the efficacy and adverse reaction of GISTs.[6],[7] However, we urgently need timely efficacy evaluation methods to guide the whole process management of GIST patients.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), speculated in 1829 and confirmed in 1955, are tumor cells originating from a solid tumor and then released into the circulation.[8],[9] Some CTCs can escape from the body's immune recognition or drug treatment, find a suitable microenvironment in the body, form seeds, grow in distant tissues or primary plants, causing tumor metastasis or recurrence.[10],[11],[12] CTCs have different forms in peripheral blood, both free single CTC and aggregated CTC cell mass, namely circulating tumor microemboli (CTM). As a vital component of liquid biopsy, the numbers of CTCs can be precisely enumerated in a certain amount of peripheral blood in a non-invasive way.[13] Recently, CTCs or CTM of many distinct tumors, such as breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, and pancreatic cancer, have been shown as a powerful biomarker to predict tumor metastasis, prognosis, and disease conditions.[14],[15],[16],[17] Meanwhile, the exact cut-off numbers of CTCs in many kinds of cancers to predict prognosis have been described. Cornelis et al. found that for metastatic colorectal cancer, patients with CTCs ≥3 will have a shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).[15] For patients with early or advanced breast cancer, CTCs ≥1 or ≥5 from peripheral blood indicate poor prognosis.[18],[19] In the newest American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Staging Manual, CTCs are listed as a prognosis assessment tool.[20]

The values of CTCs/CTM in GIST patients have yet to be elucidated, especially the whole process management of disease outcomes. A previous study on CTCs of GIST patients employed anoctamin 1 (ANO1), previously called Discovered On Gastrointestinal tumor protein 1 (DOG1), as the biomarker and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) to detect the expression of DOG1 in the blood of GIST patients. DOG1 expression in peripheral blood significantly correlated with poor disease-free survival (DFS) and DOG1 detection is of clinical potential for monitoring recurrence and IM treatment.[21] Others developed a monoclonal antibody 84-1, specific cell-surface vimentin (CSV) to capture and enumerate CTCs of GISTs. However, the classic CSV positive CTCs was abundant in metastatic GISTs but failed to predict metastasis.[22] The detection and value of CTCs/CTM in the whole process management of GIST patient treatment is unclear.

To explore the features of CTCs/CTM under the whole course of GIST treatment, we conducted a real-life study and enrolled 150 GIST patients confirmed by pathologic diagnosis and analyzed the characteristics of CTCs/CTM in the whole process management of GIST patients.


   Patients and Methods Top


Study patients

The first affiliated hospital of Nanjing Medical University offers physicians the possibility to detect the CTCs/CTM and drug plasma concentration of their patients from both outpatients and inpatients. During February 2018 to September 2019, a cohort of 150 patients with pathologically confirmed GIST in theFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were included in this real-life study. All patients had complete demographic, clinical, and pathological information. The study was approved by theFirst Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University ethics committee (ethical approval code: 2013-SR-142, date: 02-12-2013).

Data collection

All patients signed informed consent at the time of enrollment. Demographic and clinicopathological information were collected at enrollment and the subsequent follow up. After the enrollment, all patients were followed up every three months. The cohort was divided into five subgroups by the disease status: Group A, patients before surgery; Group B, patients after surgery and without IM; Group C, patients after surgery and treated with IM; Group D, recurrent GISTs; Group E, unresectable GISTs. Of these 150 GIST patients, 109 patients from group B, D, and E were treated with IM CTC detection and IM plasma concentration tests were performed each visit.

CTC detection

The isolation by size of epithelial tumor cell (ISET) assay was performed as described in an earlier study by Vona et al.[23] The samples were processed on an automated testing platform as per the manufacturer's instructions. The filtration module was provided by Wuhan YZY Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). A total of 5 ml of whole blood was diluted up to 8 mL with buffer containing 0.2% formaldehyde and filtered through a membrane having 8 mm pore size. Harvested CTCs/CTM were stained with Romanowsky stain, air-dried at room temperature, and mounted. Based on our own experience and the criteria proposed by other research groups, cells isolated in this study were assigned as tumor cells only if they had the following morphological characteristics: atypia of the nucleus (irregular shape, presence of a nodular, lobulated contour); nuclear– cytoplasmic ratio >0.8; nuclear diameter (the long diameter) >18 mm; hyperchromatic nuclei and nonhomogeneous staining; thickened, sunken, wrinkled, and jagged nuclear membrane; the presence of nuclear chromatin side-shift or large nucleoli or presence of abnormal mitotic figures; and presence of tumor cell aggregations, or CTM. If four features or more were met, they were considered as malignant tumor cells (CTCs). All candidate CTCs/CTM were blindly reviewed and identified independently by three senior cytopathologists. Immunofluorescence staining for cells of differentiation CD45, CSV, and DAPI was conducted for further confirmation. The detailed method of staining was recorded in the Supplementary materials.

Imatinib plasma concentration

For IM trough plasma concentration detection, 5 ml venous blood of GIST patients treated with IM was collected before taking the medicine. The IM concentration was tested by the liquid chromatography-tandem massspectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method, as previously described.[6] The lowest detectable blood concentration is 10 ng/ml. For the accuracy of plasma concentration, each sample was tested three times independently.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted with the Graphpad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, California, USA) and Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 20.0 (Chicago, USA). Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The association of clinicopathological factors with positive rate of CTCs was evaluated via Chi-square test. Multivariate analysis of the positive rate of CTCs using a binary logistic regression model was done. The correlation between the counting data was tested by linear correlation, and the variables of the two groups were analyzed by Student's t-test.


   Results Top


CTCs and CTM determination results

During the immunofluorescence staining, 4',6-diamidino-2- phenylindole (DAPI) was used to identify the nucleus, CD45 was employed to combine the leukocytes and the CSV was designed to distinguish the CTCs origin from GIST tumor. [Figure 1]a is the result of CTCs from two independent GIST patients. [Figure 1]b demonstrates the CTM from two other different GIST patients.
Figure 1: Isolation of CTCs and CTM in peripheral blood samples from GIST patients. (a) CTCs diagram of two different patients with GIST. (b) CTM diagram of two different patients with GIST. Nuclei were stained blue with DAPI, CSV and CD45 were dyed red and green

Click here to view


Clinicopathological characteristics of GIST patients

As demonstrated in [Figure 2], 17 patients were drawn before surgery (Group A), 112 GIST patients were enrolled after surgery with 84 patients who were treated with IM (Group C), 25 were advanced GIST patients with 8 unresectable GISTs (Group D), and 17 recurrent GIST patients (Group E). The mean age was 56.81 ± 10.64 years. Of these, 87 (58%) cases had tumor located in the stomach, 54 (36%) in small intestine, 4 (2%) in the colorectum, and 5 (3%) in the other sites of the abdomen. According to the revised National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2009 risk classification,[3] 2 (1%) of the 150 patients were defined as very low risk, 14 (9%) patients were characterized as low risk, 47 (31%) patients as intermediate risk, and 87 (58%) as high risk. The detailed demographic and clinical features are summarized in [Table 1].
Figure 2: The Flow chart of the study

Click here to view
Table 1: Association between clinicopathological variables of GIST patients and positive rate of CTCs

Click here to view


Variables affecting the positive rate of CTCs

In terms of qualitative analysis, 72% exhibited positive CTCs. [Table 1] shows the results of univariate analysis for positivity of CTCs. Tumor diameter, mitotic count, and Ki 67 may significantly influence the detection rate of CTCs (P < 0.05). Then, a logistic regression model analysis was used to explore the independent factors affecting the positive rate of CTCs. As shown in [Table 2], only tumor diameter significantly correlated with the detection of CTCs (P < 0.05). Moreover, although patients' status at detection is not a variable affecting the positive rate of CTCs, patients with unresectable tumors have the highest positive rate, at 87.5%. After the tumor resection, the positive rate of CTCs decreased from 82.35% to 66.67% [Figure 3]a.
Table 2: Multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors affecting positive rate of CTC

Click here to view
Figure 3: Correlation between clinical-pathological features and the number of CTCs in GIST patients. (a) CTCs positive rate and median CTCs number of GIST patients in different status. The left axis is CTCs positive rate and the right axis is median CTCs number. The abscissa is different state of GIST patients (A, patients before surgery; B, patients after surgery and without IM; C, patients after surgery and treated with IM; D, Recurrent GIST; E, Unresectable GIST). (b) Tumor diameter is correlated with the number of CTCs (R2 = 0.074;P < 0.001). (c) Ki 67 expression is correlated with the number of CTCs (R2 = 0.054;P < 0.005). (d) The association of mitotic count and CTCs numbers (**P < 0.01). (e) The association of risk stratification and CTCs numbers. (f) The relationship between patients' status and the number of CTCs (**P < 0.01).

Click here to view


Factors influencing the number of CTCs

For the quantitative analysis, we analyzed the clinicopathological factors influencing the exact number of CTCs. The average and median of the CTCs are 28 and 4, respectively, ranging from 0 to 301. Like positive rate of CTCs, we found that patients with unresectable tumors have the highest median CTC number [Figure 3]a. Tumor size and Ki 67 expression significantly correlated with CTC number [Figure 3]b and c, P < 0.001]. Compared with patients with mitotic count fewer than 5/10 HPF, patients with mitotic count of more than 10/50 HPF have more CTCs [Figure 3]d, P < 0.01]. However, patients with disparate risk stratification showed no significant difference [Figure 3]e, P > 0.05]. Besides, the number of CTCs in patients with unresectable tumor was higher than that in patients before surgery [Figure 3]f, P < 0.05]. We also explored the effect of tumor location on the number of CTCs, but the result showed no difference. [Supplement [Figure 1]a.

Variables effecting the number of CTM

The number of CTM is strongly linearly correlated with CTCs with R-square value of 0.708 [Figure 4]a, P < 0.001]. Unlike the CTCs, the number of CTM did not correspond to tumor diameter [Figure 4]b, P > 0.05], while the CTM was linearly bound up with Ki 67 expression [Figure 4]c, P < 0.001]. In addition, patients with a distinct mitotic count, risk stratification, status, and tumor location showed no differences [Figure 4]d, [Figure 4]e, [Figure 4]f, Supplement [Figure 1]b, P > 0.05].
Figure 4: Association of CTM number and clinicopathological variables of GIST patients. (a) The CTM number is significantly correlated with CTCs number (R2 = 0.708;P < 0.001). (b) Tumor diameter is not correlated with the number of CTM (R2 = 0.017; P = 0.119). (c) Ki 67 expression is correlated with the number of CTM (R2 = 0.089;P < 0.001). (d) The association of mitotic count and CTM numbers. (e) The association of risk stratification and CTM numbers. (f) The relationship between patients' status and the number of CTCs

Click here to view


IM plasma concentration may not affect the CTCs/CTM of GIST patients

The average IM plasma concentration was 1173 ± 425 ng/ml, ranging from 425 ng/ml to 2660 ng/ml. In [Figure 3]f and 4f, we found that taking IM is not the significant influencing factor of CTC and CTM detection. To further explore whether IM blood concentration could affect the CTCs/CTM, the IM trough plasma concentration of 109 GIST patients was determined by LC-MS/MS method. We divided the 130 patients into 2 groups by the plasma concentration 1100 ng/ml.[24] As shown in [Figure 5]a and b, there was no difference in the number of CTCs/CTM in patients with different IM blood concentration (P > 0.05).
Figure 5: Effect of IM plasma trough concentration on CTCs/CTM. (a) There is no difference in the number of CTCs in patients with different IM blood concentration (P > 0.05). (b) There is no difference in the number of CTM in patients with different IM blood concentration (P > 0.05)

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Recently, new developments have brought us more ways to diagnose, treat, and evaluate GIST patients, such as liquid biopsy, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), CTCs, next-generation sequencing (NGS), and artificial intelligence (AI).[25],[26],[27] Of these new methods, liquid biopsy is more attractive to clinicians and researchers because of its non-invasive or minimally invasive, accurate, and direct characteristics.[25] CTCs of many solid tumors have been well studied, while CTCs of GIST patients are rarely reported.[14],[15],[16],[17] The research of CTCs in varied tumors can be divided into clinical studies and fundamental researches. From a clinical perspective, efforts have been made to summarize the characteristic of CTCs and use it to diagnose the disease early, evaluate prognoses, and even predict relapse.[15],[18],[19],[21] As regard to fundamental researches, investigators explored the mechanisms of CTCs derivation in neoplasm, movement in peripheral blood, communication with other cells or tissues, and formation of metastases.[28],[29],[30]

In this study, we enrolled 150 GIST patients in different disease processes and drew their peripheral blood to isolate the CTCs and CTM. The CTCs and CTM were detected via the ISET method. After detection, we used a variety of statistical methods to analyze the influencing factors of CTCs and CTM. The positive rate of CTCs in our study is 72%, which is similar to previous reports (54-73%).[21],[22] While some investigators employed DOG1 to recognize GIST CTCs via qRT-PCR method, we used CSV to isolate the single CTC and counted the exact number of CTCs under the fluorescence microscope.[22] Meanwhile, unlike the metastatic GIST patients enrolled by others, we included GIST patients at various stages of the disease process including before surgery, after surgery with/without IM, recurrent GIST and unresectable GIST.

Here, we included patients from the whole process management of GIST for the first time in a real-life setting. For patients after surgery, the positive rate of CTCs is decreased compared with patients before surgery, but without significant difference. Tumor diameter is the independent factor affecting the positive rate of CTCs. Our results are different from Li et al., which found that the tumor size, mitotic count, and risk levels are related to the positive rate of CTC merely by univariate analysis.[21] Regarding CTCs and CTM, we found a number of them have an intensive linear correlation. Moreover, we demonstrated that GIST patients with bigger tumor size, higher Ki 67 expression, and the mitotic count have more CTCs. However, of all the clinicopathological variables, only Ki 67 expression is significantly related to the number of CTM. Certainly, the current study still has some limitations. In a real-life setting study, the design is not as strict as the randomized control trial, and the results may be less reliable. While the sample size could be larger, but the number is not insignificant considering the very low incidence of GIST. We also intended to explore the relationship between IM plasma trough concentration and CTCs/CTM, but the results showed the number of CTCs/CTM would not be affected by the plasma concentration. We speculate that the phenomenon may be due to the fact that IM is a classic kind of molecular targeted drug rather than a cytotoxic drug.

In conclusion, we included GIST patients from different disease processes in the real-life setting study and illustrated that tumor diameter predicted positivity of positive rate of CTCs. Furthermore, we found that the numbers of CTCs and CTM have an intensive linear correlation. Tumor diameter, Ki 67 expression, and mitotic count are related to the number of CTCs. Patients with higher Ki 67 expression tend to have more CTM. These results are instructive for clinicians to understand CTC or CTM in patients with GIST.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our thanks for technical support provided by Wuhan YZY Biopharma Co. Ltd.

Financial support and sponsorship

Grant support: Our work was sponsored by funds from Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK2019023046, to H.X.), Six talent peaks project in Jiangsu Province (WSW-326, to Y.C.M.), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD, JX10231801), Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University (all to Z.K.X). The Science and Technology Development Fund of Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University (KD2019KYJJZD009, to Z.Q.), Health Science and technology project of lianyungang (201914, to Z.Q.)

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.


   Supplementary Files Top


Supplementary Methods: Immunofluorescence staining

The sample was subsequently treated with 200 μl 0.5% Triton X 100 for 5 min and rinsed with PBS for 3 × 2 min. Subsequently, 100 μl 10% goat serum (Jackson ImmunoResearch Europe, Ltd., Newmarket, UK) in PBS was added to the filter membrane and allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature; the excess serum was removed. The samples were incubated at 4°C overnight with 100 μl primary antibody (anti CD45; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA; cat no. sc 70699; and anti CSV; Abnova, Taiwan, CN; cat no. H00007431-M08), diluted 1:500 and 1:200, respectively, with 10% goat serum. Thee samples were rinsed with PBS for 3 × 3 min, 100 μl secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated goat anti rat; cat no. A11006; or Alexa Fluor 647 conjugated goat anti rabbit; cat no. A21245; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) diluted 1:500 with 10% goat serum was added, and the slides were incubated for 50 min at room temperature. Following washing with PBS 3 × 2 min, the films were sealed with DAPI and observed by fluorescence microscopy (magnification, x40). When images of the slides had been captured, Wright Giemsa staining was performed (10,17) for comparison with the immunofluorescence results. The slides were stained with 100 μl diff A (Eosin; YZY Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China; catalog no. YZY CTC P100) for 1 min at room temperature. Following rinsing with PBS for 1 min, 100 μl diffB (Methylthioninium Chloride; YZY Medical Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; catalog no. YZY CTC P100) was added for 90 sec at room temperature. The slides were then rinsed with deionized water three times for 30 sec each time and dried for 30 min at 50°C. Following mounting with permanent mounting medium (Baso Ultra Clear Advanced Mounting Resin; Baso Biotechnology Co., Ltd.; catalog no. BASE BA 7004), the slides were dried for 1 h at 50°C. Finally, the cells were observed using an optical microscope (magnification, x40).





 
   References Top

1.
Cioffi A, Maki RG. GI stromal tumors: 15 years of lessons from a rare cancer. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:1849-54.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Joensuu H, Roberts PJ, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Andersson LC, Tervahartiala P, Tuveson D, et al. Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 in a patient with a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. N Engl J Med 2001;344:1052-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Demetri GD, Wang Y, Wehrle E, Racine A, Nikolova Z, Blanke CD, et al. Imatinib plasma levels are correlated with clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:3141-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Tham CK, Poon DY, Li HH, Tan MH, Choo SP, Foo KF. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour in the elderly. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2009;70:256-61.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Ganjoo KN, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma, Version 2. 2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018;5:536-3.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Zhang Q, Xu J, Qian Y, Chen L, Li Q, Xu K, et al. Association of imatinib plasma concentration and single nucleotide polymorphisms with adverse drug reactions in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17:2780-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Zhang Q, Li Z, Xu K, Qian Y, Chen M, Sun L, et al. Intracellular concentration and transporters in imatinib resistance of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019;54:220-6.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Recamier JCA. L'histoire de le Meme Maladie. Gabor; 1829. p. 110.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Engell HC. Cancer cells in the circulating blood; a clinical study on the occurrence of cancer cells in the peripheral blood and in venous blood draining the tumour area at operation. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 1955;201:1-70.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Gay L, Baker AM, Graham TA. Tumour cell heterogeneity. F1000Res 2016;5. doi: 10.12688/f1000research. 7210.1  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Brown HK, Tellez-Gabriel M, Cartron P, Vallette FM, Heymann M, Heymann D. Characterization of circulating tumor cells as a reflection of the tumor heterogeneity: Myth or reality? Drug Discov Today 2019;24:763-72.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Micalizzi DS, Haber DA, Maheswaran S. Cancer metastasis through the prism of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in circulating tumor cells. Mol Oncol 2017;11:770-80.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Bhan I, Mosesso K, Goyal L, Philipp J, Kalinich M, Franses JW, et al. Detection and analysis of circulating epithelial cells in liquid biopsies from patients with liver disease. Gastroenterology 2018;155:2016-8.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gao H, Chakraborty G, Lee-Lim AP, Mo Q, Decker M, Vonica A, et al. The BMP inhibitor Coco reactivates breast cancer cells at lung metastatic sites. Cell 2012;150:764-79.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Cohen SJ, Punt CJ, Iannotti N, Saidman BH, Sabbath KD, Gabrail NY, et al. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 2009;20:1223-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
de Bono JS, Scher HI, Montgomery RB, Parker C, Miller MC, Tissing H, et al. Circulating tumor cells predict survival benefit from treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:6302-9.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Pang T, Xu Z, Pothula S, Becker T, Goldstein D, Pirola RC, et al. Circulating pancreatic stellate (stromal) cells in pancreatic cancer-a fertile area for novel research. Carcinogenesis 2017;38:588-91.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Pierga JY, Bidard FC, Autret A, Petit T, Andre F, Dalenc F, et al. Circulating tumour cells and pathological complete response: Independent prognostic factors in inflammatory breast cancer in a pooled analysis of two multicentre phase II trials (BEVERLY-1 and -2) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab. Ann Oncol 2017;28:103-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hayes DF, Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Miller MC, et al. Circulating tumor cells at each follow-up time point during therapy of metastatic breast cancer patients predict progression-free and overall survival. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:4218-24.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:93-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Li Q, Zhi X, Zhou J, Tao R, Zhang J, Chen P, et al. Circulating tumor cells as a prognostic and predictive marker in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A prospective study. Oncotarget 2016;7:36645-54.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Li H, Meng QH, Noh H, Somaiah N, Torres KE, Xia X, et al. Cell-surface vimentin-positive macrophage-like circulating tumor cells as a novel biomarker of metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Oncoimmunology 2018;7:e1420450.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Vona G, Sabile A, Louha M, Sitruk V, Romana S, Schutze K, et al. Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells: A new method for the immunomorphological and molecular characterization of circulatingtumor cells. Am J Pathol 2000;156:57-63.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Joensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol 2008;39:1411-9.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Pantel K, Alix-Panabieres C. Liquid biopsy and minimal residual disease - Latest advances and implications for cure. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019;16:409-24.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Xu H, Chen L, Shao Y, Zhu D, Zhi X, Zhang Q, et al. Clinical application of circulating tumor DNA in the genetic analysis of patients with advanced GIST. Mol Cancer Ther 2018;17:290-6.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Wang C, Li H, Jiaerken Y, Huang P, Sun L, Dong F, et al. Building CT radiomics-based models for preoperatively predicting malignant potential and mitotic count of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Transl Oncol 2019;12:1229-36.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Yu M, Bardia A, Wittner BS, Stott SL, Smas ME, Ting DT, et al. Circulating breast tumor cells exhibit dynamic changes in epithelial and mesenchymal composition. Science 2013;339:580-4.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Aceto N, Bardia A, Miyamoto DT, Donaldson MC, Wittner BS, Spencer JA, et al. Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell 2014;158:1110-22.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Cheung KJ, Ewald AJ. A collective route to metastasis: Seeding by tumor cell clusters. Science 2016;352:167-9.  Back to cited text no. 30
    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Dr. Hao Xu
Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210029
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_24_20

Rights and Permissions


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
   Patients and Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Supplementary Files
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed386    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded62    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal