Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology
Home About us Instructions Submission Subscribe Advertise Contact Login    Print this page  Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 
Users Online: 7095 


 
Table of Contents   
LETTER TO THE EDITOR  
Year : 2011  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 162
Surgery for esophageal cancer: Apples and oranges


VMMC, Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi - 110 023, India

Click here for correspondence address and email

Date of Web Publication2-Mar-2011
 

How to cite this article:
Chintamani. Surgery for esophageal cancer: Apples and oranges. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2011;17:162

How to cite this URL:
Chintamani. Surgery for esophageal cancer: Apples and oranges. Saudi J Gastroenterol [serial online] 2011 [cited 2020 Oct 29];17:162. Available from: https://www.saudijgastro.com/text.asp?2011/17/2/162/77254


Sir,

We read with great interest the article by Khan et al, regarding predictors of outcome in esophageal cancers. The conclusions of the article, however, only reinforce the significance of some well-known variables. As accepted by the authors themselves, this retrospective study has many limitations. Performance status (Karnowsky or European Co-operative Oncology Group (ECOG) scales) is a very reliable and objective predictor of outcome and one would be keen to know the performance status of patients in both the groups and whether this influenced the type of surgery and preoperative preparation. Although the authors do mention that most patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy, it would be important to know the type of surgery performed in the "minority." It is both expected and known that mortality is higher in patients with postoperative morbidity, such as pleural effusion and chylothorax. The authors have attributed the occurrence of pleural effusion to the technique of the surgeon, although this and other complications following esophagectomy are also related to the disease burden. [1],[2],[3] It would be of interest to know whether any lymph node dissection was performed and what was the yield in both groups (two-field or three-field surgery)? A major and very important risk factor affecting the outcome of esophageal cancers is the "surgeon" himself. [4] Comparing outcomes in two distinct groups without ensuring that the surgery is performed by the same operating team would be like comparing "apples" to "oranges."

 
   References Top

1.Khan N, Bangash A, Sadiq M. Prognostic indicators of surgery for esophageal cancer: A 5 year experience Saudi J Gastroenterol 2010;16:247-52.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Gupta D, Lis CG. Pretreatment serum albumin as a predictor of cancer survival: A systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Nutr J 2010;9:69  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Park DP, Welch CA, Harrison DA, Palser TR, Cromwell DA, Gao F, et al. Outcomes following oesophagectomy in patients with oesophageal cancer: A secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care 2009;13:S1.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Earlam R, Cunha-Melo JR. Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: I. A critical review of surgery. Br J Surg 1980;67:381-90.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    

Top
Correspondence Address:
Chintamani
VMMC, Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi - 110 023
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.77254

Rights and Permissions




 

Top
  
 
  Search
 
  
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1434    
    Printed62    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded306    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal